: Werner Boesen
: Children's Rights and the Philosophy of Childhood: A Generational Dialogue
: epubli
: 9783748521082
: 3
: CHF 11.80
:
: Familie
: English
: 97
: kein Kopierschutz
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB
The philosophy of childhood is still a young science area. Human being is childhood and adulthood and requires communication, a dialogue. The dialogue philosophy offers an integrative basis in the interdisciplinary context of psychology, biology, pedagogy, sociology, law and religion:•What is childhood?•Which natural law does a child have?•Who carries the responsibility for a child?•Which stages of childhood development can be differentiated in dialogue philosophy?•What means the generation concept for childhood and adulthood?•What is the basic thesis of education?•Which myth (fairy tale) was paved the way for our state constitution?•Which parenting conflict remains unsolvable?•What fundamental rights are missing in the United Nations Convention on the rights of child?•Which rights and duties can be deduced from the self-understanding of nature? Towards adulthood being a child means a weaker position and the risk of abuse. In the childhood-philosophical sense, an answer to the risks of being a child and the best possible protection of the child is required. The legal foundation is the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. But we do not reach the children with laws. It takes more than just dialogue and parental care. There are controversial arguments in politics and science. The author finds clear answers.

Werner Boesen, geb. 1955, Dipl.-Kfm., verh., 5 Kinder, erlebte früh den Verlust der Eltern, die Jugend verbrachte er in Pflegefamilien. Sein Studium ergänzte er mit Erkenntnissen aus Soziologie, Psychologie und Philosophie. Nach 40 Berufsjahren, überwiegend bei der SAP SE, hilft er nun Menschen bei gravierendem Verlust wie Tod und zu frühe Trennung der Eltern. Sein weiterer Schwerpunkt sind Kinderrechte und Kindheitsphilosophie auf der Basis des Generationendialogs Eltern-Kind im Sinne eines statischen und dynamischen Kindheitsverständnisses.

Children’s Rights: Between permanence and change


Moral Rights with view on childhood phases


Children’s rights have been included in the philosophical discussion only in the course of the written specifications of human rights. The last two hundred years of literature have dealt with a modern childhood conception, and the last hundred years of science (Archard p. 33). The French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau is notable here with ‘Emile or about education (1762)’ (Archard p. 1 Emile (1762) the earliest manifesto for a ´child-centred´ education). Prior to this, the English philosopher John Locke published his ideas on childhood (Some Thoughts concerning Education 1693, Archard ibid.: He did not write a philosophical treatise on childhood…recommends the appropriate education for a young gentleman). Kant stands for ‘priority thesis’ and a dynamic view on childhood limited to the time until the outgoing adolescence (More you will find in the last chapter of this publication, for graphical derivation, see: Boesen 2017). A breakthrough was made by the United Nations in the year 1959, and in 1989 the moment came valid version of the UNCRC (For history, seehttp://www.kinderrechte.de/kinderrechte/geschichte-der-kinderrechte/Accessed 01.08.2017). In the meantime, over 190 states have ratified the UNCRC, but only a few have included it in the state constitutions (Archard p. 107). Archard cites several reasons for the importance of the UNCRC. It has an influence on laws and policy makers who think about status quo of children (ibid.). It serves as a crucial benchmark for governments to report progresses in the field of children’s rights (ibid.). There are regular reports and clear obligations for the infrastructure (ibid.). Nevertheless the practical and statutory influences of UNCRC are limited. First of all, Archard alludes to the worldwide systematic abuse of children’s rights. Many children are subject to forced labor, refugees and child asylum seekers are often separated from their families. Orphans under government welfare and control are often subject to various forms of abuse, and reside in institutions where they experience trauma and neglect (ibid p. 109). Archard identifies the absence of an international court (ibid.) in many countries as a main reason for the lack of implementation of the UNCRC. However, since April 14 th. 2014 the possibility of individual complaint with third optional protocol (short OP3 CRC): ‘OP3 CRC came into force three months after the 10th State ratified the protocol. A complaint against one of the ten first States parties can be brought in relation to a violation of children’s rights that took place after this date’ (See: What is the OP3 CRC?https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPICCRC.aspxAccessed 13.03.2019). The following countries have joined this appeals procedure at 25 September 2014: ‘[…] 13 States had ratified OP3 CRC: Albania, Belgium, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Gabon, Germany, Ireland, Monaco, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain and Thailand.’ (ibid.).

Archard evaluates the UNCRC as the magnum opus of international legal children’s rights (ibid. p. 57). Since no legal claim has been formulated on the UNCRC in the German Basic Law, they remain moral rights although the view is justified: ‘These need not be accepted as moral rights.’ (Archard 2016 Stanford Encyl.). Meanwhile, a political majority will incorporate children rights into the constitution, see (https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/mediathek/72628!search?query=kinderrechte+ins+grundgesetz&search-button=%C2%A0&newSearch=trueAccessed 13.03.2019).

Archard compares moral rights with adult ones (Archard p. 60) and affirms that children’s rights are also those ones they need to become future adult life (ibid. p. 63). Thus, it is obvious to consider each development phase of childhood. The view on childhood phases clarifies the importance of main emphases of children’s rights. The importance of the first childhood stages in particular are shown by Sigmund Freud (Psychiatrist, 1856 – 1939, Arnold et al. Vol 1 p. 635. founder of Psychoanalysis (Hügli p. 303) and afterward of Depth psychology (Arnold ibid, All citations from Arnold are translated from the German into Eng