: Britt-Marie Thurén
: Women, Men and Persons Managing Gender Meanings in Middle Class Madrid
: Books on Demand
: 9789181148466
: 1
: CHF 8.80
:
: Sozialwissenschaften allgemein
: English
: 422
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB
Urban ethnography about gender change Madrid in the 1990s was a lively place. This book presents ethnographic examples and analyses of the way gender meanings were changing. The context is middle class; comparisons are made with an earlier work in a working class area of Valencia. The theoretical focus is on processes of cultural change, using mainly speech in natural situations as the empirical base since talking is one form of doing. The historical and social background is also described. Madrilenian conversations were full of examples from all walks of life and personal situations. The historical moment was one of change from an authoritarian society to a more democratic one. These larger circumstances were often symbolized in terms of gender issues. A common idea in Madrilenian discussions was that women should be or become persons. This use of the concept"person" has little to do with individualism or psychology. It was rather an everyday way of expressing opposition to essentialized and hierarchical categorizations. The phrase meant that a"person" is an active human being who refuses to be categorized by others, whereas a"woman" must look and behave so that her gender is clearly contrasted to that of a"man". And this, it was thought, places women at a disadvantage. But there were also those who thought that a woman can only be a person if she is a"woman" first.

Britt-Marie Thurén is a retired professor of social anthropology and gender studies. Her work focuses on urban contexts and class conditions in Spain. Theoretically, it concerns gender and change, mainly analyzed through ethnography of speech. Most of her publications can be found here: bmthuren.wordpress.com She has worked at several Swedish universities, especially Stockholm University. She is a citizen of both Sweden and Spain.

Chapter 2. The City, the Middle Class and the Women


This chapter contains background facts on the city of Madrid and on its new middle class. The purpose is to enable the reader unfamiliar with Spanish reality to contextualize the data and the interpretations in the rest of the book. Where did the protagonists live and why, what did they do for a living and in their leisure, what was their economic situation and what were the most important differences in opinion among them?

The reader should bear in mind that the description refers mostly to the 1990s.

City space

During the 1940s Madrid was still a small city, and recovering from the demographic effects of the civil war. In the late 1950s immigrants from rural areas started to arrive, and during the 1960s they flooded the city, building huge shanty towns all around it. There were jobs for all.

The 1970s was the decade when most of these shanty towns disappeared, because some of their inhabitants could now afford to buy apartments on the open market and because cheap dwellings were built for most of the rest of them. During this decade, especially towards the end of it, the flow of immigrants to the cities diminished, since there were fewer job opportunities. In the eighties there was little in-migration and some out-migration, as unemployment soared.18

The result was that downtown Madrid was under-sized for its population. This became ever more noticeable as the former shanty town paupers bought cars and could afford to come downtown for recreation and as they also demanded access to city facilities such as schools, universities and hospitals.

It also meant that most of the outlying residential areas were relatively recent, of low quality and inhabited by people of rural origin. And it meant that public transportation was inadequate there at the same time as private transportation clogged the streets that were built for a population for whom the dream of a car seemed light-years away. Other public facilities also lagged far behind private consumption: schools, health care, post offices and parks were scarce and low quality, and libraries and facilities for recreational activities hardly existed at all. The brutal unemployment of the 1980s concentrated here.

All of this in turn meant that these areas were infested with social problems, especially drug addiction and small-time but tenacious criminality.

From the point of view of the Madrilenian middle class, this used to mean that one had to live in the downtown area; anything else was unthinkable. But the downtown area was much too small and the middle class had exploded in size. The consequence was that middle class apartments in downtown Madrid had reached impossible price levels. The middle class had to find other places to live. As the downtown area during the eighties was invaded by the general social ills of the city, they also wanted to move out.

Starting on a small scale during the 1970s and gathering speed during the 1980s, middle class residential areas were built on the outskirts of Madrid. But these areas were clearly segregated according to income levels.19

The outlying middle class areas were better quality and offered larger apartments than the working class areas. In accordance with capitalist logic, they offered more local services for pay to the residents. They also featured such symbolic markings as entrances outfitted with wooden panels, potted green plants and always a counter for the door watchman, whether one was actually in residence or not, and perhaps a narrow lawn outside.

The environment outside the buildings was not beautiful; the price level of land permitted neither one family dwellings nor creative town planning for middle-middle class areas. Typically, streets were straight, parking space scarce and buildings high and built close together. However, the further out you went, the lower the land prices and therefore the more"green space" (as the advertisements called it). Thus there was a tension in middle c