: Frank Pucelik, John McBee, Ray Wilkins
: Reality Wars Disassociated States Therapy
: Books on Demand
: 9783759710918
: 1
: CHF 17.60
:
: Psychologie
: English
: 334
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB
The beginning of Neuro - Linguistic - Programming lies in"Meta Foundations" and the linguistic magic founded, researched and taught by Frank Pucelik, Richard Bandler and John Grinder in Kresge College, Santa Cruz in the 70`s. This book is the clinical and acedemic result of the 7 year Research programm run by Pucelik and his group of assistants who he still calls"the kids." It is unique in its entirety and covers all Meta Foundations that Pucelik still uses in his work and teaches his therapists and counsellors. Anybody working in the field of Psychotherapy, Coaching or Counselling should read this book and be able to understand how the human mind works, the changing force of Linguistics and the source of NLP. The book is visually enhanced with the Art of Ray Wilkins who is also a wellknown therapist and coach. Frank Pucelik now lives and works in Odessa, Ukraine where he trains Therapists and Counsellors in Trauma and PTSD.

Frank Pucelik is one of the three founders of Neuro Linguistic Programming. He has founded centers for Youth Addiction and PTSD in the United States and Ukraine. He now lives and works in Odessa, Ukraine where he trains Coaches and Counsellors to work with Veteran soldiers and their Familiies suffering from Trauma and PTSD.

PART I


CHAPTER THREE.


THE FABRIC OF REALITY, SLEIGHT OF MIND: HOW WE CREATE TRUTH.


We do not act directly upon our sensory experience, but upon what we re-present to ourselves. We act not directly upon the world, but upon our model of the world.

"Laws as such do not make people better," said Nasrudin to the King,"They must practice certain things, in order to become attuned to inner truth. This form of truth resembles apparent truth only slightly."

The King decided that he could, and would, make people observe the truth. He could make them practice truthfulness.

His city was entered by a bridge. On this he built a gallows. The following day, when the gates were opened at dawn, the Captain of the Guard was stationed with a squad of troops to examine all who entered. An announcement was made.

"Everyone will be questioned. If he tells the truth, he will be allowed to enter. If he lies, he will be hanged." Nasrudin stepped forward.

"Where are you going?"

"I am on my way," said Nasrudin slowly,"to be hanged."

"We don't believe you!"

"Very well, if I have told a lie, hang me!"

"But if we hang you for lying, we will have made what you said come true?"

"That's right, Now you know what the truth is, YOUR truth!"

(The Exploits of the Incomparable Mulla Nasrudin by Idries Shah)

In order to assist in changing someone's behavior you need to change the way he is representing his experience to himself. We construct models of the world through the process of abstraction (Chap 8). The process of abstraction depends upon processes people use to construct their models of the world. Each of these processes have specific sensory-based indicators that can be detected. By learning to package our communication in ways that cooperate with his models of the world, we can more effectively assist him in changing.

The whole focus of Part II is not just to describe how a person creates a model of the world, but in giving you precise indicators that can be detected and hence, learned. An excellent understanding of the power of this observational ability can be found in the world of fiction. Sherlock Holmes is credited with being one of the most skillful observers in all of literature. Even though he is noted for his impeccable reasoning ability, it is his effective use of his senses, his observation skills, that makes possible his relentless reasoning. In the"Adventure of the Cardboard Box," Mr. Holmes eloquently describes the observation process in an encounter with Dr. Watson!

Finding that Holmes was too absorbed for conversation I had tossed aside the barren paper and leaning back in my chair, I fell into a brown study. Suddenly my companion's voice broke in upon my thoughts.

"You are right, Watson," said he."It does seem a most preposterous way of settling a dispute."

"Most preposterous!" I exclaimed, and then suddenly realizing how he had echoed the innermost thought of my soul, I sat up in my chair and stared at him in blank amazement.

"What is this, Holmes?" I cried."This is beyond anything which I ever could have imagined." He laughed heartily at my perplexity."You remember," said he,"that some little time ago when I read you the passage in one of Poe's sketches in which a close reasoner follows the unspoken thoughts of his companion, you were inclined to treat the matter as a meretour-de-force of the author. On my remarking that I was constantly in the habit of doing the same thing you expressed incredulity."

"Oh,