: Masoud Kazemzadeh
: Mass Protests in Iran From Resistance to Overthrow
: Walter de Gruyter GmbH& Co.KG
: 9783111280387
: De Gruyter Contemporary Social SciencesISSN
: 1
: CHF 93.00
:
: Sozialwissenschaften allgemein
: English
: 268
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB
Mass Protests in Iran: From Resistance to Overthrow explores the various waves of protests in Iran over the past 44 years, surveying their causes, consequences, and outcomes. The author argues that the regime and its support base of fundamentalist groups constitute a minority in Iran and lack legitimacy, and thus the regime uses repression and violence to secure its rule. The result is a pre-revolutionary situation and a shifting political landscape of overthrows, constant mass protests and mass repression. Kazemzadeh's analysis highlights the factors that would assist the fundamentalist regime in succeeding in suppressing these protests, and the factors that would assist the Iranian people in defeating the fundamentalist regime.
Written in an accessible style, this timely book offers a much-needed contribution to the literature on Iranian politics. It will be of interest to students and scholars, as well as policy makers, interested in Middle Eastern studies, social movements, protest movements, political science and sociology.

Masoud Kazemzadeh, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA.

Chapter 1 Introduction


1.1 A Brief History of Protests Since the 1979 Revolution


The 1977 – 1979 protests were a broad-based popular revolution against the Shah’s dictatorship. The objectives of the revolution were to establish independence, freedom, and social justice. The opposition to the Shah included secular liberal democrats and social democrats of the Iran National Front (INF), liberal Islamists (e. g., Liberation Movement of Iran), various Marxist groups, and conservative Islamists (Khomeini). As fundamentalists gained more support among the population, they changed the slogan from “Independence, Freedom, Social Justice” to “Independence, Freedom, Islamic Republic.”

The Shah was widely considered to be a puppet of the British and Americans whose primary objective was to serve their colonial interests. For example, after the 1953 coup, which was organized by the CIA and MI6, the Shah returned Iran’s oil that had been nationalized by Mossadegh to a consortium of major oil companies. The Shah’s agreements with the oil companies were canceled by the provisional government in 1979 and Iran’s oil was in the hands of Iranians again.1 There were no freedoms of expression, of the press, or of political parties. The Shah’s secret police, SAVAK, engaged in horrendous torture of dissidents including high school children and university students who had committed no crime other than reading books that the regime did not approve of. There were no free elections and the Shah had violently imposed his one-man tyranny.2 The Shah, his family, and their cronies were engaged in outright theft, financial corruption, and graft that made them grotesquely rich while millions of the people lived in abject poverty. The Pahlavis and theirnouveaux riches close associates lacked theNoblesse oblige of the upper classes or the social consciousness of the modern middle classes. Their extravagant, opulent, and pretentious lifestyles as well as their arrogance and condescending attitude toward the rest of the population alienated the overwhelming majority of the people. The demand for social justice came to mean that national wealth (state income from oil, natural gas, and the like) should be distributed fairly and legally among the population rather than siphoned off to a handful of corrupt monarchists.

1.2 Resistance to Khomeini’s Dictatorship, 1979 – 1981


The fall of the Shah did not usher in what many had struggled for. The so-called “Bahar Azadi” [Spring of Freedom] after the overthrow of the Shah’s dictatorship did n