: Joachim Dieter Schulze
: behaviour - At another time
: Books on Demand
: 9783756825165
: 1
: CHF 8.90
:
: Historische Romane und Erzählungen
: English
: 312
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB
The factuality of historical events presented in the narrative during the development phase of the revolutionary state after the lost First World War focuses on the terrorist mischief of the Nazi leader Adolf Hitler and the consequences of his terrorist actions. Murder as the unconditional method of seizing power, expanding it and maintaining it, not only led to the downfall of the state, but also to a lasting shock effect on the souls of the people in the completely destroyed country, who accused themselves of cheating by supporting the Nazis great guilt and joint responsibility, should put up with. In fact, Verena made a common cause when she cooperated with the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and - albeit terroristically - worked preventively towards their goals, which were actually goals of the police. But she only worked indirectly for the federal prosecutor, especially not when she shot him. Should intrigues lead to action, so that the criminally acting policeman got out of the focus of the federal prosecutor's office and thus that of the initiated federal prosecutor? Did she take money for the triple murder in Karlsruhe? Her actions disappear in the inscrutable mysticism of a compulsive and foolhardy soldier of the Red Army Faction, as if she wanted to rise to the rank of great world savior, very much like Hitler, if she didn't shoot the general but saved the people from him because he be a Nazi? Was she an agent of secret services and influential world politicians? Verena leaves the pressing questions unanswered and cloaks herself in silence. If Kette believes it from her, then he should prove it to the court. In this narrative, he reveals facts and backgrounds with his plea, which contribute significantly to clarifying the facts.

Joachim Dieter Schulze is a poet and freelance writer from northern Germany who deals with the problem of human irascibility in literature. On a socio-critical basis, he narrates in a philosophical manner on the problem areas of addiction, relationship conflicts, politics and terrorism.

Part 1

On the essence of the H.


Chapter 1


At another time it could have cost her her life, and under such circumstances she would not have been allowed to roam free at the time. Now she not only entered the courtroom freely but also camera-friendly through the door. Although she was a bit stooped, she took a seat in the dock without hesitation. She was on par with the panel. Two lawyers are sitting next to her; in casual robes and with longer, natural hair, they somehow seemed young at heart, modern. They had nothing to say to each other now. They were followed by Chain and his wife, the joint plaintiffs, who sat apart from them and to the side of the judge's podium. In other words, only Chain, as she wants to call him, present himself as a joint plaintiffs in this hearing.

At another time she would hardly have been allowed to speak, if she had been heavily guarded and placed behind bars, where she would have had to listen in silence to the accusation, the testimonies of the witnesses and their reproaches. In the run-up to this hearing, Chain at least regretted that she had at least broken her silence from back then and had at least declared herself ready to make a statement. Still, it didn't seem enough to him. He believed that if the accused had been more willing to testify, the facts could have been clarified more thoroughly and more truthfully.

She didn't want to admit it and she felt that further covering up important facts in a whole spate of lies and bad cover-ups would only take a sad continuation with this trial, allowing others to get away and innocents to serve time for a murder they did not commit. But the public prosecutor's office did not bring any murder charges against her, even though, according to Chain's plea, this would even be a triple murder for which innocent people have long since disappeared behind bars, even though she was the alleged perpetrator. It's up to Chain and it's typical for him. The crime was now thirty-two years ago and how should she remember April 7th, 1977 if she could no longer reliably say where she was on that day. But she didn't think she was in Germany.

In fact, it began thirty-three years before she was born in 1919, a year of revolution. At that time it was not an act of violence that forced the overthrow, but its complete opposite, namely the abandonment of the war, the cessation of fire in the positions of Verdun. The surrender led to a return to the negotiating table. The emperor had capitulated to the enemy. After all, army officers went over to the people as a whole. The people were shocked: the workers, the peasants, the military, the women, all employees, all officials, the press. First the mood that followed the event was the abdication of the emperor and with his disappearance the authoritarian state disappeared. From the German Reichstag in Berlin, Scheidemann proclaimed the German Republic, which from now on is one emanating from the people.

Immediately there was a dissenting voice, that of Karl Liebknecht, on the square in front of the palace, and he proclaimed the free, socialist republic as the leader of the Spartacus League, the fraction of revolutionary communists with a Moscow orientation that the German bourgeoisie believed it to be. In Russia, a coup led to mass extermination and the murder of the Russian tsar family. In Germany, many people were afraid that the same could now happen here too, with the formation of a revolutionary council, which was finally made up of all the existing parties in the country and appointed a nobleman, Prince Max von Baden, as the first Reich Chancellor, who initially gave the people a made the reassuring message: there will be no shooting. The Reich Chancellor had ordered that no use of arms should be made by the military. So this revolution proceeded tamely and without further bloodshed, and thus became an example of the fact that things could be done differently.

And it was quick with that. A constitution was quickly put in place that essentially continued the liberal and democratic tradition of 1848, with which the central political organ, the new Reichstag, was founded. From now on, the chancellor and every minister are bound by their confidence, which can be withdrawn. And the representative part of the Kaiser was replaced in the form of government of the monarchy, which had been replaced, by a Reich President, who was given extensive powers, above all supreme military command and