: Hynek Jerabek, Thomas Petersen, Hannes Haas, Rudolf Richter
: The Early Days of Survey Research and Their Importance Today
: new academic press
: 9783700320265
: 1
: CHF 15.00
:
: Sozialwissenschaften allgemein
: English
: 312
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
Paul Felix Lazarsfeld ­ 1901 in Wien geboren, 1976 in New York gestorben ­ wurde in den USA zu einem der Gründerväter gleich mehrerer Disziplinen: Soziologie, Politologie und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Braumüller/nap legt den ersten Reader zu einem der ganz Großen der modernen Sozialwissenschaften vor.Zu wenigen anderen Namen finden sich in Personenregistern großer sozial- und wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher Studien so zahlreiche Eintragungen wie zu Paul Felix Lazarsfeld. Dennoch: Anders als bei manchen seiner Generationskollegen ­ Theodor W. Adorno, Siegfried Kracauer, Norbert Elias oder Heinz Hartmann;Max Weber, Georg Simmel oder Helmuth Plessner ­ korrespondiert Lazarsfelds Rang und Bedeutung nicht mit seiner heutigen Sichtbarkeit. So gibt es keine anspruchsvolle Edition seiner Werke und auch keine Biografie. Selbst Einzelausgaben sind selten. Mit dem ersten Band der neuen Braumüller-Reihe Edition Sozialwissenschaften liefert Herausgeber Wolfgang Langenbucher eine umfassende Dokumentation von Leben und Werk und eine angemessene Würdigung des Paul Felix Lazarsfeld.
Contents5
Preface9
Introduction10
Acknowledgments16
References16
1 Six Examples of Collaboration Between Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Robert K. Merton18
1. The Program Analyzer and the Focused Interview19
2. “Mass Persuasion” and the “Firehouse Projects”22
3. Patterns of Influence: “Influentials” – the Siblings of “Opinion Leaders”25
4. Interplay of Theory and Empirical Research27
5. Theory and Methodology in Teaching Seminars and “Friendship as a Social Process” as an Example29
6. “A Professional School for Training in Social Research” (PFL and RKM 1950) and the Battle for a Model of Post-graduate Study (1952–1956)32
Conclusion: Two Evaluations of the Collaboration between Lazarsfeld and Merton36
References40
2 Paul Lazarsfeld: Marginality, Migration and the Institutionalization of Research44
Importance47
Methods and procedures48
Columbia and dominance53
The irony of marginality55
Social change and the fate of ideas57
References58
3 Asking for Justifications: An Aspect of Paul Lazarsfeld’s “Reason Analysis”59
An Observation about Emotive Trigger Events61
A Commentary63
References63
4 Lazarsfeld’s Approach to Researching Audience65
The Context of Media Research65
Coverage Analysis68
Audience Segmentation68
Evaluative and Affective Reactions69
Methods and Techniques69
Program Analyzer71
The Program Analyzer at Work72
Customary Applications and the Later Use of the Program Analyzer75
After the Program Analyzer75
The Legacy of Lazarsfeld’s Approach77
References79
5 Straw Polls in the U. S.: Measuring Public Opinion 100 Years Ago82
The Literary Digest88
Business and Politics90
Today’s business-news poll links93
References94
6Hadley Cantril’s Theoretical and Methodological Legacy in Current Public Opinion Research101
Cantril as a Prominent Public Opinion Theorist101
Toward Methodological Knowledge104
Toward Relevant Research Outcomes109
Conclusion111
References112
7 Three Stages in the Institutionalization of Empirical Social Research116
1. A short review of literature on the institutionalization of ESR116
2. General Model of Establishment of Empirical Social Research as Part of Academic Sociology118
3. Twelve Key Decisions in Chicago – The First Stage in the Institutionalization of Empirical Social Research118
4. Processing Mass Data: Survey Research – the Second Stage in the Institutionalization of Empirical Social Research122
5. Survey Analysis: A New Strategy of Data Analysis – the Third Stage in the Institutionalization of Empirical Social Research125
6. Empirical Social Research Is a Part of Academic Sociology – What Does This Mean?130
References132
8 Rediscovering the Prehistory of Social Research in Austria135
Basic notions, broader ideas and methods136
Social research and its tasks140
Conclusion142
References143
9 Cenek Adamec and the Early Stages of Public Opinion Research in the Czech Lands145
The Czechoslovak Institute for Public Opinion Research146
Cenek Adamec152
Theoretical and Methodological Questions156
The Year 1948 and the End of the Institute160
References163
10 The Early Days of Survey Research in Latin America166
The first surveys in Latin America and the “Office of Inter-American Affairs”166
Debates within the U. S. State Department166
Hadley Cantril: the founder of communication research in Latin America167
“The Export Information Bureau” and its mass media research activities169
The first scientific surveys in Brazil and Argentina170
Frictions between the State Department and the OIAA170
The cancellation of the contracts with 4 A’s174
The Coordination Committees and research on the mass media in Latin America174
Research conducted in the field of radio176
Research conducted in the field of the press177
Research in the field of motion pictures178
Early survey research in Latin America – a balance179
References180
11 “The Obvious and Logical Way to Ascertain the Public’s Attitude Towa