: Paul Kamudoni, Nutjaree Johns, Sam Salek
: Living with Chronic Disease: Measuring Important Patient-Reported Outcomes
: Adis
: 9789811084140
: 1
: CHF 85.50
:
: Allgemeines
: English
: 170
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF

This book serves as a roadmap for the development and application of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, supporting beginners through to experts, as a practical guide. To elucidate on key concepts in the book, examples from clinical research in hyperhidrosis and health-related quality of life and medicines clinical development context, are used. Health-related quality of life represents one of the most commonly measured PROs in both routine clinical practice and research. The book demonstrates the importance of PROs to patients with chronic disease and how such outcomes can assist clinicians in managing patients and monitoring their response to treatment in terms of both symptoms and impacts.

This book will benefit readers as a single-source practical guide on the development of modern PRO measures and may also serve as a blueprint for the conceptualization and planning of evidence generation related to PROs in various settings. Ideas and suggestions on how to navigate recent developments shaping the field of PRO measurement are also offered.



Dr Paul Kamudoni (PhD MSc.) is a Scientific Associate Director in the Global Evidence and Value Development - R&D department at Merck KgaA in Darmstadt (Germany) where he leads the Centre of Excellence for Patient Reported Outcomes. Dr Kamudoni trained as a Pharmacoeconomist and a Clinical Outcome Measurement Scientist at Cardiff University. In his day to day work, he is involved in the development and validation of PRO measures, and the design and integration of PRO endpoints in clinical trials and other types of studies. He maintains an active research interest in methodological issues in the integration of electronic health records with prospective PRO assessments, and the application of item response theory in PRO measurement among others.

Dr Nutjaree Pratheepawanit& bsp;Johns(PhD PharmD) is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, and melatonin research group, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. She has held a number of academic positions both in Thailand and abroad, including a fellowship at the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB) (Olympia, WA, USA). Dr Johns has an expertise in cancer care and quality of life (QoL) research and collaborates with several cancer centres in Northeastern Thailand. She has developed and tested a number of PRO measures including cross-cultural adaptation into the Thai language. Dr Johns is also a principal investigator in many clinical trials investigating the effects of disease or interventions on QoL of cancer patients. She has been a recipient of several prestigious awards including Scholarship for Developing Country, International Society for Quality of Life Research and the Doyle Prize: Postgraduate section, Palliative Medicine Journal.

Profess r Sam Salek(PhD RPh FFPM FRPS MCMS FESCP) is Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology at the University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, visiting Professor at the Estate of Hessen, Germany, and Director of the Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK. Professor Salek's research focuses mainly on four areas: development and application of PRO measures; drug safety evaluation and pharmacovigilance; pharmacoeconomics and economic evaluation of healthcare; and pharmaceutical regulation& medicines development in the mature and emerging markets. He has published 22 books and 600+ journal articles and abstracts. Professor Salek is a member of five Editorial Boards and an active member of several societies.

Foreword5
Preface7
Contents9
Part I: A New Roadmap for Development of a PRO Measure13
1: Overview14
Patient-Reported Outcome as a Concept15
Scope for the Use of PROs15
Assessing PROs in Long-Term Conditions17
Approaches to Measuring PROs20
Aims and Objectives21
References23
2: Approaches to the Development and Use of PRO Measures: A New Roadmap25
Characteristics of a PROM: Core Measurement Attributes26
Conceptual Framework26
Measurement Models and Scoring Algorithms26
Acceptability and Practicality27
Validity27
Content Validity27
Construct Validity28
Criterion Validity29
Reliability29
Internal Consistency29
Split-Half Reliability29
Inter-Rater Reliability30
Temporal Stability (Test-Retest Reliability)30
Responsiveness30
Interpretability31
Characteristics of a PROM: Additional Attributes31
Response Scales31
Frame of Reference31
Mode of Administration32
Interview Format32
Paper-and-Pencil Self-Completion32
Electronic PRO (ePRO) Self-Completion33
Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Self-Completion33
A Roadmap for the Development of a PROM33
Step 1: Define Objectives of Development of the PROM35
Step 2: Generate Hypothesis and Conceptualise the PROM: Disease Model/Hypothetical Conceptual Physico-Psychosocial Model35
Review of Literature and PROMs35
Disease Burden35
Appraisal of Relevant PROMs36
Development of Hypothetical Conceptual Framework36
Step 3: Gather and Select Item Concepts: Concept Elicitation/Qualitative Research36
Eliciting Patient Input: Investigating the Experience of Patients Using Qualitative Research Methods37
Step 4: Design and Build the PROM: Content Definition/Item Generation38
Step 5: Refine the PROM’s Content: Cognitive Debriefing/Content Validation Panels39
Cognitive Interviews39
Expert Panel for Content Validation39
Step 6: Explore PROM’s Practicality and Applicability40
Step 7: Fine-Tune the PROM, Evaluate Item Performance and Establish Scoring Algorithms40
Step 8: Generate Psychometric Evidence and Other Supportive Information43
Validity43
Reliability44
Responsiveness44
Interpretability45
Cross-Cutting Emergent Approaches46
Patient Engagement46
Use of Social Networking Sites47
Appendix: Technical Notes48
Practical Considerations in Study Design During PRO Development48
Sample Size48
Missing Data49
Suggestions for Statistical Analysis in PROM Development50
Performing Exploratory Factor Analysis51
Performing Rasch Analysis52
References54
Part II: An Illustration of the New PRO measure development Roadmap Using Research in Hyperhidrosis as A Practical Example60
3: Conceptualisation and Qualitative Development of a PRO Measure61
Part I: Hyperhidrosis Disease—Disease Background61
Impact on HRQoL63
Part II: The Qualitative Development of the Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL)65
Step 1: Define Objectives of Development of the PROM65
Broad Aim65
Secondary Objectives65
Step 2: Hypothesis Generation and Conceptualisation66
Methods66
Literature Review to Uncover the Impacts of Hyperhidrosis on Patients’ HRQoL66
Critical Appraisal of the Instruments Used in HRQoL Measurement in Hyperhidrosis66
Results67
Impacts of Hyperhidrosis on Patients’ HRQoL67
Tools Used in HRQoL Measuremen