: Mineko Mohri
: Maintenance, Replacement and Recycling – Patentees’ Rights in the Aftermarkets Germany, the U.S. and Japan
: Herbert Utz Verlag
: 9783831609642
: 1
: CHF 21.30
:
: Handels-, Wirtschaftsrecht
: English
: 174
: DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
Intellectual property law is increasingly used to implement the business strategies of enterprises. If manufacturers of original products can monopolize the market in spare parts or prohibit recycling of their products by invoking their patent rights, they can devise a strategy that involves selling patented original products at a relatively low profit margin in order to profit by selling spare parts for these products. Patent law needs to establish general principles governing maintenance, replacement and recycling. Tracing back the history of the exhaustion doctrine, this study aims to highlight the current problems and to seek desirable solutions.
Preface4
Table of Contents6
Chapter 1. Introduction10
1.1 Interested Parties in the Aftermarket and Patent Exhaustion Doctrine10
1.2 Status Quo in Germany, the U.S., and Japan11
1.3 Overview of this Research13
Chapter 2. Patentees’ Rights and Purchasers’ Rights: the Exhaustion Doctrine15
Chapter 3. Cases of Maintenance, Replacement and Recycling: Scope of Allowed Activities in the Aftermarket66
3.1 Introduction66
3.2 Germany67
3.2.1 Maintenance67
3.2.2 Replacement of Parts68
3.2.3 Recycling77
3.2.4 Characteristics of Rulings79
3.3 The U.S.81
3.3.1 Maintenance81
3.3.2 Replacement of Parts82
3.3.3 Recycling92
3.3.4 Characteristics of Rulings97
3.4 Japan99
3.4.1 Maintenance99
3.4.2 Replacement of Parts in Japan100
3.4.3 Recycling101
3.5 Summary and Thoughts113
3.5.1 Comparative Summary113
3.5.2 Doubts About Known “repair / reconstruction” and “identity” Criteria114
3.5.3 A Possible Guideline: “transfer of full value” Based on the Patent Law’s Aim116
Chapter 4. Patent Enforcement and Contract / Competition Law118
4.1 Introduction118
4.2 What is a Patent Right?118
4.3 Could the Domestic Exhaustion Doctrine Be Contracted Out?119
4.3.1 The U.S. Cases on “single use only” Agreements120
4.3.2 Germany130
4.3.3 Japan131
4.3.4 Summary – Who Should Decide the Scope of “Reward”?132
4.4 IPR Enforcement in the Aftermarket134
4.4.1 “Repair Clause” in EU Design Law135
4.4.2 The U.S.139
4.4.3 Japan141
4.4.4 Summary142
Chapter 5. Conclusion: The Scope of the “ Full Value” that the Patent Regime Plans to Grant144
5.1 Summary of Findings144
5.2 Thoughts About the Road Ahead147
Zusammenfassung150
Appendix157
A. Tables of Laws157
B. Table of Cases157
C. Bibliography163