: Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser, John G. Flores
: Distance Learning Issue Volume 14 #3
: IAP - Information Age Publishing
: 9781641131964
: 1
: CHF 55.40
:
: Pädagogik
: English
: 77
: DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
Distance Learning is for leaders, practitioners, and decision makers in the fields of distance learning, elearning, telecommunications, and related areas. It is a professional journal with applicable information for those involved with providing instruction to all kinds of learners, of all ages, using telecommunications technologies of all types. Stories are written by practitioners for practitioners with the intent of providing usable information and ideas. Articles are accepted from authorsnew and experiencedwith interesting and important information about the effective practice of distance teaching and learnin.

Distance Learning is published quarterly. Each issue includes eight to ten articles and three to four columns, including the highly regarded"And Finally..." column covering recent important issues in the field and written by Distance Learning editor, Michael Simonson. Articles are written by practitioners from various countries and locations, nationally and internationally.
Front Cover1
Featured Articles2
12
Online Learning at the University of Central Florida2
132
A New Revision of the [Revised] Bloom’s Taxonomy2
292
Changing Faculty Perspective of Distance Learning Through Support2
372
Embracing Engagement Through Technology in Online Legal Education2
432
Distance Education Under Neoliberal Globalization: The Political Economy of an Emerging Trend in Education2
552
A Contemporary Look at Richard Clark’s “Mere Vehicles”2
Columns2
Online Learning at the University of Central Florida6
Denise Lowe and Tina Calandrino6
Introduction6
Beginning Years: 1995–20006
Transitional Years: 2001–20088
Growth Years: 2009–Present10
Upcoming Article Series13
Conclusion14
References14
Appendix A: Timeline of UCF’s Digital Learning Development15
Appendix B: Comparison of Student Credit Hours15
Appendix C: Fall 2016 Preliminary Student Headcount in all Course Modalities16
Appendix D: History of Online Learning Awards at the University of Central Florida17
ADD PHOTO6
ADD PHOTO6
A New Revision of the [Revised] Bloom’s Taxonomy18
Afnan Nathir Darwazeh18
Introduction18
Part I. Bloom et al.’s (1956) [Original] Educational Taxonomy19
1. Knowledge: Exhibits memory of previously learned materials by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, abstractions, generalities, and so forth.19
2. Comprehension: Demonstrates understanding of facts and ideas by giving the meaning, translating, interpreting, explaining, describing of main ideas, and so forth.19
3. Application: Uses acquired knowledge in new or novel situations to solve problems.19
4. Analysis: Examines and breaks information and materials into parts to see the details and relationships.19
5. Synthesis: Compiles information together in different ways, builds a structure or pattern from diverse elements, and puts parts together to form a whole.20
6. Evaluation: Presents opinions by making judgments about the value and the merit of ideas and materials.20
Part II. An Analysis of Anderson’s Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy With Rationales21
Part IV. A New Depiction of the [Revised] Bloom’s Taxonomy27
1. Facts’ Remembrance: It is related to recognizing, recalling, retrieving the previous learned specific information and details, such as dates, names, symbols, events, terms, labels, titles, lists, elements, parts, examples, instances, specific de...27
2. Generalities’ Remembrance: It is related to recognizing, recalling, retrieving, defining previous learned general information and ideas, such as recalling definitions of concepts, principles, and procedures (Merrill, 1983).27
3. Comprehension: It is related to constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through understanding, interpreting, explaining, paraphrasing, summarizing, discussing, clarifying, and so forth (Anderson27
Bloom et al...27
4. Analysis: It is related to breaking down the whole into its components and parts to see the details or components such as dividing, analyzing, separating, identifying, comparing, distinguishing, differentiating, discriminating, deconstructing, fol...27
5. Organizing: It is related to putting parts together or ordering according to a certain structure, fashion, pattern, theme, model, or principle such as grouping, categorizing, tabulating, classifying, chunking, ordering, listing, outlining, sum up,...27
6. Synthesis: It is related to figure out the relationships between and among the learned ideas in the text (internal synthesis) and the relationships between them with other external ideas in other texts, subjects or situations (external synthesis) ...28
7. Application: It is related to using the learned generalities (concepts, principles, or procedures) in a new novel, or strange, situation, such as transferring, translating, applying, implementing, solving, making, using, give new examples of learn...28
8. Evaluation: It is related to making judgment based on criteria and standards through critiquing, balancing, appreciating, giving the merit, making decisions, presenting opinions, evaluating, estimating, stating advantages disadvantages, selecting,...28
9. Creation: It is related to overcoming new instances and manipulating new situations to come up with new products, and laws, such as producing a new product, discovering, composing new things, generating, finding, inventing, predicting, creating, d...28
10. Metacognition: This level is related to the kind of cognitive strategy related to thinking about thinking through promoting awareness, planning, monitoring, evaluating, and regulating mental processes that the learner used in his or her learning,...28
Conclusion29
1. Moving the metacognitive process from the knowledge dimension to the cognitive dimension.29
2. Considering the metacognitive process as the most complex level of the cognition dimension not of the knowledge dimension like what Anderson claimed.29
3. Dividing remember level into two levels based on the content type: facts’ remembrance, and generalities’ remembrance.29
4. Retaining the analyzing mental level posed by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) but in a different order.29
5. Adding the organizing mental level to the cognitive dimension and put it after the analysis level.29
6. Keeping the synthesizing mental level like it was in the original Bloom’s taxonomy but in different meaning and order.29
7. Keeping the creation level like it was in the Anderson’s taxonomy after the evaluation ones30
8. Reorder the cognitive processes of application, synthesis, and organize by putting:30
9. Arranging each level of cognitive process from simple to complex according to the number of its items, factors, or components that the learner gets involved in while she or he learns.30
10. Adding the principle type of knowledge to knowledge dimension.30
11. Renaming the educational taxonomy as a learning taxonomy to fit with what happens in students’ mind and reflect their learning not their education.30
Application