: Ingolf U. Dalferth, Trevor W. Kimball
: Self or No-Self? The Debate about Selflessness and the Sense of Self. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion, Conference 2015
: Mohr Siebeck
: 9783161553554
: Religion in Philosophy and Theology
: 1
: CHF 88.00
:
: Christentum
: English
: 370
: DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
Religious, philosophical, and theological views on the self vary widely. For some the self is seen as the center of human personhood, the ultimate bearer of personal identity and the core mystery of human existence. For others the self is a grammatical error and the sense of self an existential and epistemic delusion. Buddhists contrast the Western understanding of the self as a function of the mind that helps us to organize our experiences to their view of no-self by distinguishing between no-self and not-self or between a solid or 'metaphysical' self that is an illusion and an experiential or psychological self that is not. There may be processes of 'selfing', but there is no permanent self. In Western psychology, philosophy, and theology, on the other hand, the term 'self' is often used as a noun that refers not to the performance of an activity or to a material body per se but rather to a (gendered) organism that represents the presence of something distinct from its materiality. Is this a defensible insight or a misleading representation of human experience? We are aware of ourselves in the first-person manner of our ipse -identity that cannot fully be spelled out in objectifying terms, but we also know ourselves in the third-person manner of our idem -identity, the objectified self-reference to a publicly available entity. This volume documents a critical and constructive debate between critics and defenders of the self or of the no-self that explores the intercultural dimensions of this important topic.
Cover1
Preface6
Contents8
Ingolf U. Dalferth: Introduction: The Debate about Self and Selflessness12
I. The Making of the Self through Language18
Ingolf U. Dalferth: Situated Selves in “Webs of Interlocution”: What Can We Learn from Grammar?20
1. The ‘self ’ as an operator20
2. The ‘self ’as a noun21
3. The ‘self ’ as a verb and an adverb23
3.1 The self as Dasein, Sosein and Wahrsein23
3.2 The self as the relating of a relation25
3.3 Relations, distinctions and the actual infinite28
3.4 The self as activity and mode of relating29
3.5 Two basic questions32
4. Self-interpreting animals33
4.1 Understanding and interpretation34
4.2 Changing the world by interpreting it35
4.3 Interpretation and self-interpretation36
5. Selves and situations36
5.1 The relativity and selectivity of situations36
5.2 Shared situations37
5.3 Re-presenting interpretations38
6. Self-interpretations39
7. A sense of self41
8. A perennial problem43
9. The ‘self ’ as an orienting device45
Marlene Block: God, Grammar and the Truing of the Self: A Response to Ingolf Dalferth48
1. The Utility (or not) of the View from Language48
2. Reading Ingolf Dalferth Backwards52
3. Beginning in the Midst of Grammar as Partes Orationis54
4. Rethinking Language and the Self ‘from the (Indexical) Ground Up’57
5. Final Thoughts: Theology, Grammar, and the Truing of the Self60
II. The European Legacy62
Joseph S. O’Leary: The Self and the One in Plotinus64
The Autonomy of Soul66
Elusive Selfhood69
Does Plotinus Need a Firmer Conception of Self?72
Overcoming Plotinus’s Metaphysics75
Conclusion78
Marcelo Souza: A Question of Continuity: A Response to Joseph S. O’Leary80
W. Ezekiel Goggin: Selfhood and Sacrifice in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit86
1. An Instructive Disjunction: Self, Not-Self, and the Limits of Reflection87
2. Desire and the Sacrificial Structure of Recognition90
3. Unanticipated Tasks? Some Final Remarks94
Iben Damgaard: Kierkegaard on Self and Selflessness in Critical Dialogue with MacIntyre’s, Taylor’s and Ricoeur’s Narrative Approach to the Self98
Introduction98
1. The Narrative Dimension of Contemporary Hermeneutic Approaches to Selfhood99
2. Kierkegaard’s Either-Or: To Become Oneself by Choosing Oneself104
3. Kierkegaard’s Works of Love: To Become Oneself in Selfless Love117
Closing Words123
Raymond Perrier: The Grammar of ‘Self ’: Immediacy and Mediation in Either / Or: A Response to Iben Damgaard124
1. Being a Self126
2. Being Oneself130
3. Dénouement136
III. The Self in Modernity138
Kate Kirkpatrick: ‘A Perpetually Deceptive Mirage’: Jean-Paul Sartre and Blaise Pascal on the Sinful (No?)Self140
Introduction140
1. Sartre’s lacking-self141
2. Pascal on the self145
3. Self or No-Self?151
Eleonora Mingarelli:151
Eleonora Mingarelli:151
154151
I. Breaking Through Continuity154
1. The Teleological Mind157
2. The Religious Self: Interest In Varieties159
3. The Informative Self and The Process of De-Selving164
Stephanie Gehring: After the Will: Attention and Selfhood in Simone Weil170
Introduction170
1. On Saying “I”171
1.1 On Humanness: Weil and Bergson173
1.2 Attention174
2. Decreation175
2.1 Decreation’s Dangers178
3. Love in Weil’s “Prologue”179
Conclusion181
Joseph Prabhu: The Self in Modernity – a Diachronic and Cross-Cultural Critique182
I. Adventures of Subjectivity from Kant to Nietzsche183
II. A Tentative Genealogy189
III. A Non-Dualist Alternative191
A Concluding Postscript194
Friederike Rass: The Divine in Modernity: A Theological Tweak on Joseph Prabhu’s Critique of the Modern Self198
IV. Self and No-Self in Asian Traditions204
Alexander McKinley: No Self or Ourselves? Wittgenstein and Language Games of Selfhood in a Sinhala Buddhist Form of Life206
Life Training and Religious Language206
Anaphors and Selfhood in a Sinhala Buddhist Form of Life212
Conclusion – We are Buddhists!218
Jonardon Ganeri: Core Selves and Dynamic Attentional Centering: Between Buddhaghosa and Brian O’Shaughnessy222
Leah Kalmanson: Like You Mean It: Buddhist Teachings on Selflessness, Sincerity, and the Performative Practice of Liberation230
Two Examples of the Efficacy of Proper Form231
Buddhist and Ruist Disagreements over Proper Form234
Philosophical Context237
Objections to the Efficacy of Form238
Further Speculation241
Fidel Arnecillo Jr.: Worrisome: Implications of a Buddhist View of Selflessness and Moral Action: A Response to Leah Kalmanson244
Gereon Kopf: Sel