| Harmonization of International Competition Laws: Pros and Cons | 1 |
|---|
| Index | 3 |
| Executive Summary | 5 |
| 1 Antitrust or Competition Policy: Magna Carta of free enterprise | 8 |
| 1.1 Evolution of Antitrust Regime: Antitrust 1.0, Antitrust 2.0 | 8 |
| 8 | 8 |
| 1.2 The Great Antitrust Paradigm Shift | 14 |
| 1.3 Contemporary Antitrust World | 16 |
| 1.4 Aims of Competition Policy | 17 |
| 1.5 Pillars of Antitrust Mechanism: The Efficiency Factor | 17 |
| 20 | 17 |
|---|
| 1.6 An Important Task: Create perfect blend of efficiency andfairness | 22 |
| 1.7 An Overview of Antitrust Regulation of various countries | 23 |
| 1.8 In a Nutshell | 26 |
| 2. Global Markets need Global Governance | 27 |
| 2.1 Puzzle: Whether there is need for unifying international competition policy? | 27 |
| 2.2 Need for Global Competition Laws | 28 |
| 2.3 Enforcement Dilemma: Domestic Policies and Global Market | 31 |
| 2.4 Need for Unifying Global Competition Policy | 32 |
| 2.5 Need for International Dispute Settlement Mechanism | 33 |
| 2.6 In a Nutshell | 34 |
| 3 Benefits of unifying Antitrust Regulations | 35 |
| 3.1 Transaction Cost | 35 |
| 3.2 Ready availability of expertise | 35 |
| 3.3 Maximization of Consumer Welfare | 36 |
| 3.4 Maximization of Global Welfare | 37 |
| 3.5 Efficient Allocation of World Resources | 38 |
| 3.6 Harmonization leads to increment in Productivity | 38 |
| 3.7 Collective Efficiency vs. Collective Inefficiency | 39 |
| 3.8 In a Nutshell | 40 |
| 4 Unifying Competition laws: Areas of Harmonization | 40 |
| 4.1 Unifying Substantive Regulations | 40 |
| 4.2 Unifying Procedural Aspects | 41 |
| 4.3 Unifying Level of Enforcement | 42 |
| 4.4 In a Nutshell | 42 |
| 5 Limitations of Harmonization | 42 |
| 5.1 Political Reasons | 42 |
| 5.2 Social Areas | 43 |
| 5.3 Other Reasons | 43 |
| 5.4 In a Nutshell | 44 |
| 6 Conflict Areas | 45 |
| 6.1 Conceptual Discord | 45 |
| 6.2 National Welfare vs. Global Welfare | 46 |
| 6.3 Economic Structure of Countries | 47 |
| 6.4 Erosion of National Autonomy | 48 |
| 6.5 Intergovernmental Disputes | 49 |
| 6.6 Spillover Effects | 49 |
| 6.7 Extending beyond Nation’s Jurisdiction | 50 |
| 6.8 Enforcement Mechanism | 53 |
| 6.9 Jurisdiction Conflicts and Confusions | 53 |
| 6.10 In a Nutshell | 54 |
| 7 Other Modalities of Cooperation | 55 |
| 7.1 Unilateral Approach | 55 |
| 7.2 Bilateral Form of Cooperation | 56 |
| 7.3 Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty Agreements (MLATs) | 61 |
| 7.4 Multilateral Form of Cooperation | 62 |
| 7.5 In a Nutshell | 64 |
| 8 Various Initiatives | 65 |
| 8.1 International Trade Organization (ITO) | 65 |
| 8.2 GATT | 65 |
| 8.3 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD) | 67 |
| 8.4 At EU level | 67 |
| 8.5 The UN Set | 69 |
| 8.6 World Trade Organization (WTO) | 70 |
| 8.7 International Competition Network (ICN) | 71 |
| 8.8 In a Nutshell | 74 |
| 9 Concluding Remarks | 75 |
| 9.1 The Mystery of Antitrust 4.0 | 75 |
| 9.2 Their Remarks | 76 |
| 9.3 My Observations | 79 |
| Appendix | 82 |
| Appendix I: Countries with formal Antitrust Regime | 82 |
| Appendix II: Statistics of Mega Mergers Worldwide | 83 |
| Appendix III: Statistics of Cross Border Mergers | 84 |
| Appendix IV: Mergers and Acquisitions by Foreign Controlled Firms (SelectedCountries) | 85 |
| Appendix V: Impact of International Cartel on Developing and least Developed Nations | 86 |
| Appendix VI: National and Regional Antitrust Budget | 87 |
| Appendix VII: Benchmark of Market Dominance in different Economies | 88 |
| Appendix VIII: Details of Notifications exchanged between competition authoritiesof the EC and the US | 89 |
| References | 90 |