What is Source? Whatever is true Source, it would seem we ought to channel that. (Now, if you would rather use the word God, Absolute, Given, Capital T Truth, Tao, Ground Zero,Non-Duality, Core Emptiness, Void, Field, Zero-Point, 1st Cause, Central Organizing Factor, Universal Mind, the Observer, the Transcendent One, Conscious Intension, Intrinsic Order, Life Desire, whatever is that word for you that designates the center point of the all that is, that is fine.) I mentioned Jesus channeling God the Father:For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. (John 6:38)And he that sent me is with me; the Father hath not left me alone; for I do always those things that please him. (John 8:29) Surely it appears Jesus had connection with God the Father and viewed God the Father as his Source. Then there isA Course In Miracles. A Course In Miraclesis considered to be a channeled writing. The scribe who wrote down what the “Voice”said was Dr. Helen Schucman who was assisted by Dr.William Thetford. It is suggested that the “Voice” is Jesus himself. Many claim thatA Course In Miraclesis the real teaching of Jesus. Right here we have a conflict between theBible andA Course In Miracles. Which one ischanneling true Source? If you are uncomfortable with the word channel use another word. Which one isexpressing true Source? Which one isrevealing true Source?Without knowing what true Source is, it is hard to tell. We don’t have a true Source frame set up from which to decipher theBible orA Course in Miracles. We are back to the Seth question asked earlier--How can we know if the Seth material channeled by Jane Roberts, for example, has any merit? Is the Seth material Jane Roberts’ rose-colored glasses? Are the words of Jesus in the Bible his rose-colored glasses? Was the Voice that Helen Schucman transcribed just her rose-colored glasses? Anyone can “channel” anything. How are we to know it is legitimate? And notice how certain people who channel claim they are the only one who some
