: Uwe Meixner
: Defending Husserl A Plea in the Case of Wittgenstein& Company versus Phenomenology
: Walter de Gruyter GmbH& Co.KG
: 9783110374605
: Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical AnalysisISSN
: 1
: CHF 160.50
:
: 20. und 21. Jahrhundert
: English
: 529
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB/PDF
The phenomenological approach to the philosophy of mind, as worked out by Husserl, has been severely criticized by philosophers within the Wittgensteinian tradition and, implicitly, by Wittgenstein himself. This book examines this criticism in detail, looking at the writings of Wittgenstein, Ryle, Hacker, Dennett, and others. In defending Husserl against his critics, it offers a comprehensive fresh view of phenomenology as a philosophy of mind.



Uwe Meixner, University of Augsburg, Germany.

Preface: What is at Issue?9
Remarks on the Method and the Manner of this Book16
Chapter I: On Imagining21
I.1 Ryle on imagining22
I.2 Dennett (and Ryle) on imagining31
I.3 Bennett31
4031
I.4 Husserl on imagining54
I.5 Wittgenstein (in contrast to Husserl) on imagining79
Appendix to Chapter I: The German originals of the quotations from Husserl and Wittgenstein in Chapter I, and remarks on matters of translation110
Chapter II: On Knowing the Inward Mental Life123
II.1 Against privatism and eliminativism123
II.2 Subjective and intersubjective knowledge of the inward mental life136
II.2.1 Ryle and Wittgenstein against introspection (reflexive experience)140
II.2.2 Wittgenstein’s argument against knowledge of the inward mental life169
II.2.3 Wittgenstein and Gorgias185
II.3 The true nature of consciousness, and its true epistemological consequences192
II.3.1 The root of Wittgensteinianism220
II.3.2 Knowing one’s own mind and the minds of others229
II.4 Coda: the second-person point of view239
Appendix to Chapter II: The German originals of the quotations from Husserl and Wittgenstein in Chapter II, and remarks on matters of translation246
Chapter III: On Intending267
III.1 A prologue: epoché267
III.2 Technical intentionality-predicates268
III.3 The great divide in intentionality theory – first part: Ryle (and Wittgenstein) versus Husserl271
III.3.1 Rylean Husserl and non-Rylean Husserl286
III.3.2 Does Husserl’s theory of intentionality lead to idealism?299
III.4 The great divide in intentionality theory – second part: Wittgenstein versus Husserl310
III.4.1 In corroboration of the thesis that Wittgenstein is an intentionality nihilist326
III.5 Dennett’s nihilism regarding intentionality335
III.6 Bennett335
345335
III.7 The Wittgenstein-syndrome in the theory of intentionality351
III.8 Wittgenstein’s profundity367
Appendix to Chapter III: The German originals of the quotations from Husserl and Wittgenstein in Chapter III, and remarks on matters of translation371
Chapter IV: On the Literature381
IV.1 Husserl without introspection?381
IV.2 On the difficulty of saying the phenomenological truth in the best possible way394
IV.2.1 Thompson on reflexive (or reflective) experience, inner experience, introspection394
IV.2.2 Thompson on representationalism405
IV.2.3 Thompson on imagining409
IV.3 Was Husserl an externalist?416
IV.4 Husserl’s theory of intentionality misinterpreted439
IV.4.1 The Bell does not toll for Husserl’s theory of intentionality454
IV.5 Four views of a Wittgensteinian464
IV.5.1 The first view (concerning introspection)464
IV.5.2 The second view (concerning Anscombe’s mistranslation of “Vorstellung” and, allegedly, of “Bild”)467
IV.5.3 The third view (concerning the intentionality of imaginings470
IV.5.4 The fourth view (concerning the ontological and epistemological status of imaginings)474
IV.6 Among the blind, the one-eyed is king480
IV.7 Referentialism and anti-referentialism486
IV.8 Husserl and the Clash of the Four Giants490
Appendix to Chapter IV: The German originals of the quotations from Husserl and Wittgenstein in Chapter IV, and remarks on matters of translation503
Bibliography513
Index of labelled quotations from Bennett513
520513
Index of other quoted authors527