: Kristin Börjesson
: The Semantics-Pragmatics Controversy Semantics-Pragmatics Controversy
: De Gruyter Mouton
: 9783110372588
: Language, Context and CognitionISSN
: 1
: CHF 124.20
:
: Allgemeine und Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft
: English
: 339
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: ePUB/PDF
Currently, there is a great number of approaches to the semantics-pragmatics distinction on the market. This book is unique in that it offers a comprehensive overview, comparison and critical evaluation of these approaches. At the same time, it covers a wide range of the key current topics in semantics and pragmatics (e.g., the saying/meaning distinction, minimalism vs. contextualism, (generalised) conversational implicatures).



Kristin Börjesson, University of Leipzig, Germany.

1 Introduction11
1.1 The Standard Notions and Their Problems11
1.2 Aim of the Book17
1.3 Plan of the book18
2 Against the Standard Notions of Literal Meaning and Non-literal Meaning21
2.1 Literal Meaning and Context-Independence21
2.1.1 Literal Meaning as Compositional Meaning?22
2.1.2 Literal Meaning as Context-Independent?27
2.1.3 Literal Meaning as Primary to Non-literal Meaning?33
2.2 Non-literal Meaning and Conventionality38
2.2.1 Empirical Evidence38
2.2.2 Theoretical Considerations44
2.3 Consequences for Lexical Meaning52
2.3.1 Problematic Data53
2.3.2 Approaches to Meaning in the Lexicon59
2.3.2.1 The Maximalist Approach60
2.3.2.2 The Intermediate Approach64
2.3.3 Semantic Underspecification in the Lexicon71
2.3.3.1 The Minimalist Approach71
2.3.3.2 Ruhl’s monosemic approach76
2.3.3.3 A Cognitive Approach77
2.3.3.4 Underspecification and Conventionality82
2.3.3.5 Underspecification and Semantic Relations84
2.3.3.6 More Underspecification in the Lexicon85
2.3.3.7 Underspecification of Semantic Composition88
2.4 Empirical Investigations of Aspects of Semantics90
2.4.1 Polysemy vs. Underspecification in the Lexicon90
2.4.2 Empirical Evidence for Semantic vs. Pragmatic Processing96
2.5 Why the Standard Notions?101
2.6 Summary105
3 Utterance Meaning and the Literal/Non-literal Distinction109
3.1 Levels of Meaning110
3.1.1 Grice’s Four Types of Meaning110
3.1.2 Bierwisch’s Three Levels of Meaning115
3.1.3 Summary120
3.2 The Problem of Characterising the Level of Utterance Meaning122
3.2.1 Explicit/Implicit Meaning124
3.2.1.1 Explicatures124
3.2.1.2 Implicitures133
3.2.2 Unarticulated Constituents vs. Hidden Indexicals137
3.2.3 Minimal Semantic Content and Full Propositionality148
3.2.4 Minimal Proposition vs. Proposition Expressed157
3.3 Summary164
4 Utterance Meaning and Communicative Sense – Two Levels or One?169
4.1 Problematic Phenomena171
4.1.1 Metaphor171
4.1.1.1 Traditional Characterisation and its Problems171
4.1.1.2 Metaphor and The Similarity of Various Types of Meaning173
4.1.1.3 Metaphor and Attributive Categories176
4.1.1.4 Empirical Results Concerning Metaphor Interpretation178
4.1.1.5 Formal approaches to metaphor interpretation182
4.1.1.6 Summary189
4.1.2 Irony191
4.1.2.1 Traditional Characterisation and its Problems191
4.1.2.2 Irony as echoic interpretive use192
4.1.2.3 Irony as a Form of Indirect Negation195
4.1.2.4 Empirical Results Concerning Irony Interpretation198
4.1.2.5 Summary205
4.1.3 Conversational Implicatures206
4.1.3.1 Generalised vs. Particularised Conversational Implicature – Theoretical Approaches206
4.1.3.2 (Mostly) Empirical Evidence Concerning GCIs217
4.1.3.3 Summary226
4.1.4 Speech Acts227
4.2 Differentiating What is Said from What is Meant232
4.2.1 What is Said/What is Meant and Indirect Speech Reports234
4.2.2 Primary vs. Secondary Pragmatic Processes239
4.2.3 What is Said/What is Meant and Distinct Knowledge Systems244
4.3 Summary252
5 Varieties of Meaning, Context and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction256
5.1 Towards an Alternative Characterisation of (Non-)Literal Meaning256
5.1.1 Literal Meaning and Types of Non-literal Meaning258
5.1.2 Literal Meaning as ‘Minimal Meaning’265
5.1.3 Nature of the Processes Determining (Non)-Literal Meaning271
5.1.4 (Non-)Literal Meaning as (Non-)Basic Meaning278
5.2 The Nature of Context in Utterance Interpretation285
5.2.1 Context and the Interpretation of Implicit Meaning Aspects286
5.2.1.1 Free Enrichment and Implicit Meaning Aspects286
5.2.1.2 Discourse Interpretation and Information from Conceptual Frames290
5.2.1.3 Free Enrichment and Information from Conceptual Frames294
5.2.1.4 Consequences302
5.2.2 Context, Semantic Interpretation and the Semantics/ Pragmatics Distinction303
5.3 Summary314
6 Summary317
List of Figures321
Bibliography323
Index335