: Alain Wijffels
: Case Law in the Making. The Techniques and Methods of Judicial Records and Law Reports. Vol. 2: Documents.
: Duncker& Humblot GmbH
: 9783428490769
: Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History
: 1
: CHF 94.10
:
: Allgemeines, Lexika
: English
: 487
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
By the end of the middle ages and in early-modern Europe, judges in superior or central courts had risen to a prominent position in society and played a crucial role in legal developments. Whether in the Common Law system or in continental Europe, the courts' decisions became a focus for legal reasoning, forensic arguments and doctrine. Yet, it remains controversial to what extent these developments reflected the emergence of case-law in a modern sense. From a comparative perspective, it is also questionable whether, in spite of obvious institutional and procedural differences, the Common Law and the European Civil Law traditions produced a corpus of judge-made law which, if not by the way it was elaborated, at least by its results in the respective legal systems, played a similar role in the constant interaction between the various sources of law. The present volumes, which are a sequel to the volume 'Judicial Records, Law Reports, and the Growth of Case Law' (J. H. Baker ed.), published in 1989, specifically consider the relationship between judicial records and law reports. The emphasis of the contributions is on the techniques applied by the authors of both records and reports. Records, whether in the Common Law tradition or in continental Europe, developed mainly in order to satisfy procedural requirements, whereas the authenticity of early reports did not meet the same standards as in modern times. Both these observations raise the question of the purpose of records and reports in the law-making process. Volume 1 contains essays discussing these questions in the Anglo-American tradition (Common Law, Equity, English Canon Law) and in various continental-European traditions (Italy, France, Germany, the Low Countries and the Roman Catholic Church). Volume 2 illustrates these essays by producing extensive samples of both records and reports in the systems reviewed in the first volume. Thus, the present publication offers the unique combination of scholarly texts which review the latest results of current legal-historical debates on the role of judges' decisions in medieval and early modern law, and, for the first time, a source-book of the courts' practices and the reporters' methods in a wide range of legal systems.
Contents6
Part One: English and American Traditions8
J. H. Baker: The Common-Law Courts of Medieval England: Year Books and Plea Rolls10
I. Chaloner v. Moresle (1329)10
Report10
Translation of the Report10
Record10
II. Rex v. Bury (1321)11
Report11
Translation of the Report12
Record13
III. Randolf v. Abbot of Hailes (1311)14
Report14
Translation of the Report15
Record17
IV. Fyloll v. Ashley (1520)18
Report18
Translation of the report20
Record24
D. J. Ibbetson: Report and Record in Early-Modern Common Law28
Sample Reports28
The Record49
W. H. Bryson: Equity Reports and Records in Early-Modern England54
1. Attorney General v. James Bond (Ex. 1587)54
I British Library MS. Add. 35943, f. 134v, pl. 154
Translation54
II Cambridge University Library MS. Ee.6.12, f. 32, pl. 355
Translation55
III Moore’s Reports 238, 72 English Reports 55355
Translation56
IV Public Record Office E. 123/13, f. 84v, pl. 3 (4 July 1587)56
V Public Record Office E. 123/13, f. 123v, pl. 3 (14 November 1587)57
VI Public Record Office E. 123/13, f. 137v, pl. 2 (28 November 1587)57
2. Katherine Ayliffe v. John Duke (Ch. 1655)57
I British Library MS. Hargr. 174, f. 21 v, pl. I57
II 2 Freeman’s Reports 152, 22 English Reports 112458
III Public Record Office C. 33/203, f. 723 (20 February 1655)58
IV Public Record Office C. 33/203, f. 992 (21 May 1655)59
3. William Morehead v. Margaret Douglas (Ex. 1655)62
I British Library MS. Lansd. 1077, f. 60v, pl. 562
Translation62
II Hardres’ Reports 23, 145 English Reports 36062
III Public Record Office E. 125/36, f. 262, pl. 2 (20 November 1655)63
IV Public Record Office E. 125/36, f. 273, pl. 1 (24 November 1655)64
4. William Curtis .. Thomas Smallridge (Ch. 1664)65
I Public Record Office C. 33/219, f. 403 (6 February 1663)65
II 1 Chancery Cases 43, 22 English Reports 68566
III 1 Equity Cases Abridged 377, 21 English Reports 111467
IV 2 Freeman’s Reports 178, 22 English Reports 114367
V Public Record Office C. 33/221, f. 499 (26 January 1664)67
5. Leonard Robinson v. Anne Bell (Ch. 1690)69
I 2 Vernon’s Reports 146, 23 English Reports 70169
II 1 Equity Cases Abridged 237, 21 English Reports 101570
III Public Record Office C. 33/274, f. 744. (5 July 1690)70
6. William Crane v. John Hill (Ex. 1695)74
I Lincoln’s Inn MS. Misc. 559, f. 10 (Edward Ward‘s Reports)74
II Public Record Office E. 126/16, f. 303 (7 December 1695)78
7. John Kent v. Oliver Bridgman (Ch. 1704)82
I Precedents in Chancery 233, 24 English Reports 11382
II 2 Equity Cases Abridged 159, 22 English Reports 13683
III Public Record Office C. 33/303, f. 107 (16 December 1704)83
R. H. Helmholz: The English Ecclesiastical Courts Appendix86
Records86
1.86
2.87
3.90
4.92
5.93
6.94
Reports95
7.95
8.96
9.97
10.98
11.99
12.99
W. H. Bryson: Virginia Law Reports and Records, 1776 - 1800102
1. Rawleigh Downman, Jr. .. Joseph .. Downman, John Chinn, and Rawleigh W. Downman, executors, etc., of Rawleigh Downman, deceased (1791)102
I Northumberland District Court Order Book No. 1, p. 52 (3 April 1790)102
II Northumberland District Court Order Book No. 1, p. 69 (9 April 1790)103
III 1 Washington‘s Reports 26103
IV Miscellaneous Virginia Law Reports, p. 15 (Charles Lee‘s Reports)107
V Miscellaneous Virginia Law Reports, pp. 27, 28 (John Brown‘s Reports)108
VI Court of Appeals Order Book No. 2, p. 69 (8 June 1791)109
VII Court of Appeals Order Book No. 2, p. 72 (10 June 1791)109
VIII Northumberland District Court Order Book No. 1, p. 151 (2 September 1791)109
2. Thomas Turner v. John Wright, lessee of John Stip (1794)110
I Winchester District Court Order Book No. 1, p. 513 (24 April 1793)110
II 1 Washington’s Reports 319110
III Miscellaneous Virginia Law Reports, p. 23 (Charles Lee’s Reports)114
IV Miscellaneous Virginia Law Reports, p. 52 (John Brown’s Reports)114
V Court of Appeals Order Book No. 3, p. 16 (27 October 1794)114
VI Court of Appeals Order Book No. 3, p. 18 (28 October 1794)115
3. George Pickett v. Richard Morris (1796)115
I 2 Washington’s Reports 255115
II Court of Appeals Order Book No. 3, p