| Chapter 1. Introduction | 13 |
|---|
| Chapter 2. Researching talk-in-interaction | 21 |
|---|
| 2.1 Looking through the participants’eyes | 21 |
| 2.2 Doing CA | 27 |
| 2.3 Investigating institutional talk | 29 |
| Chapter 3. The dynamic discursive nature of identity | 32 |
|---|
| 3.1 Identity as a social construct | 33 |
| 3.1.1 Symbolic interactionism | 33 |
| 3.1.2 Impression management theory | 37 |
| 3.2 Identity as a members’category | 43 |
| 3.2.1 Indexicality and members’construction of reality | 43 |
| 3.2.2 Membership categorization | 45 |
| 3.2.3 Doing being X | 53 |
| 3.3 Identity, self, and, face | 57 |
| 3.3.1 Goffman’s notions of face and facework | 57 |
| 3.3.2 Face in Watts’ social theory of politeness | 59 |
| 3.3.3 Integrating the concept of face in a CA approach | 63 |
| 3.4 Identity construction as a means to an end | 65 |
| 3.4.1 Social positioning | 65 |
| 3.4.2 Stylization of self and other | 69 |
| Chapter 4. Ethnographic background | 73 |
|---|
| 4.1 Structure of conferences | 74 |
| 4.2 Types of contributions in conference discussions | 77 |
| 4.3 Discursive roles in discussions | 88 |
| 4.3.1 What questioners do | 89 |
| 4.3.2 What answerers do | 91 |
| 4.3.3 What chairpersons do | 94 |
| 4.4 Asking questions | 96 |
| 4.4.1 What is a question? | 96 |
| 4.4.2 Yes/No interrogatives | 99 |
| 4.4.3 Constructing questions to achieve agreement | 105 |
| 4.4.4 Contrasting academic question-answer sessions with interviews | 108 |
| 4.5 Self-presentation – a key feature of conference participation | 109 |
| 4.5.1 Members’ reasons for organising and participating in conferences | 109 |
| 4.5.2 Self-presenting in the community | 112 |
| Chapter 5. The data | 119 |
|---|
| 5.1 Data collection | 119 |
| 5.2 Corpus structure | 120 |
| 5.3 Transcription conventions | 121 |
| Chapter 6. The mechanics of discussions at academic conferences | 127 |
|---|
| 6.1 TCU completion and assessment | 127 |
| 6.2
|