: Matthias Irmer
: Bridging Inferences Constraining and Resolving Underspecification in Discourse Interpretation
: Walter de Gruyter GmbH& Co.KG
: 9783110262018
: Language, Context and CognitionISSN
: 1
: CHF 168.50
:
: Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft
: English
: 423
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF
< >This book develops a formalization that permits the integration of indirect anaphoric relationships in the construction of a structured discourse representation. From a broader perspective, it provides a suitable dynamic-logic framework that contextually constrains and inferentially resolves underspecification in cohesion and coherence of discourses. In addition, the book provides a synopsis of the problems, methods, approaches, and desiderata of research on text, context, and discourse interpretation.



< PAN lang=EN>

Matthias Irmer,University of Leipzig, Germany.

Preface6
Acknowledgements8
Contents10
Introduction18
1 Pragmatic Inferences24
1.1 Semantic Underspecification and Pragmatic Enrichment24
1.1.1 Underspecified Semantics25
1.1.2 Accounts of Pragmatic Inference29
1.1.2.1 Conversational Implicatures30
1.1.2.2 Generalized Conversational Implicatures33
1.1.2.3 Explicatures35
1.1.2.4 Primary and Secondary Pragmatic Processes36
1.1.2.5 Abductive Inferences37
1.1.2.6 Conclusion38
1.1.3 Properties of Pragmatic Inferences39
1.2 Formal Approaches to Defeasible Reasoning42
1.2.1 Default Logic44
1.2.2 Circumscription49
1.2.3 Commonsense Entailment52
1.2.4 Abductive Reasoning54
1.2.5 Conclusion58
1.3 Pragmatic Inferences Beyond the Sentence Level60
1.3.1 Text and Discourse60
1.3.2 Cohesion62
1.3.3 Coherence65
1.3.3.1 An Intentional View on Discourse Coherence67
1.3.3.2 An Informational View on Discourse Coherence68
1.3.4 Looking Ahead69
2 The Common Ground and Intentions in Conversations74
2.1 The Common Ground74
2.1.1 Definitions of Shared Knowledge74
2.1.2 The Use of the Common Ground in Conversation79
2.1.2.1 Evidence from Language Production79
2.1.2.2 Evidence from Language Comprehension80
2.1.2.3 Discussion and Conclusion81
2.1.3 Establishing the Common Ground82
2.1.3.1 Accumulation83
2.1.3.2 Grounding83
2.1.3.3 Structuring the Common Ground86
2.1.4 Conclusion87
2.2 Modelling Intentions in Discourses89
2.2.1 Optimality Theory for Discourse Pragmatics90
2.2.2 Linguistic Communication as a Game93
2.2.3 Conclusion95
3 The Discourse Model and Discourse Anaphora96
3.1 Discourse Anaphora97
3.1.1 Types and Distribution of Anaphoric Expressions97
3.1.2 Syntactic and Semantic Notions of Anaphora101
3.2 The Discourse Model105
3.2.1 Conceptions of Discourse Models105
3.2.2 Requirements on Discourse Models109
3.3 Discourse Referents111
3.3.1 Introducing Discourse Referents in the Discourse Model111
3.3.2 Accessing Discourse Referents as Antecedents for Anaphora113
3.3.2.1 Familiarity113
3.3.2.2 Givenness114
3.3.2.3 Accessibility115
3.3.2.4 Salience117
3.3.2.5 Activation118
3.3.3 Conclusion120
3.4 Theories of Anaphora Resolution120
3.4.1 A Pragmatic Account121
3.4.2 Computational Accounts125
3.4.2.1 Focus Theory125
3.4.2.2 Centering Theory126
3.4.3 Dynamic Semantics and Discourse Representation Theory131
3.4.3.1 Context as Index132
3.4.3.2 Dynamic Semantics133
3.4.3.3 Discourse Representation Theory134
3.4.3.4 Anaphora in DRT139
3.4.3.5 Discussion141
3.4.4 Conclusion142
4 Discourse Structure144
4.1 Characteristics of Discourse Structure145
4.1.1 Discourse Segments: Basic Structural Units145
4.1.2 Connecting Discourse Segments146
4.1.2.1 Discourse Markers146
4.1.2.2 Discourse Relations147
4.1.3 The Form of Discourse Structure148
4.1.3.1 Sequences148
4.1.3.2 Stacks149
4.1.3.3 Trees150
4.1.3.4 Graphs154
4.1.4 Conclusion157
4.2 Discourse Relations158
4.2.1 Hobbs’ Coherence Relations159
4.2.2 Kehler’s Three Types of Coherence160
4.2.2.1 Coherence Relations: Cause-Effect160
4.2.2.2 Coherence Relations: Resemblance161
4.2.2.3 Coherence Relations: Contiguity163
4.2.2.4 Linguistic Phenomena Explained by Kehler’s Taxonomy164
4.2.2.5 Problems with Kehler’s Theory168
4.2.3 Rhetorical Structure Theory170
4.2.4 Rhetorical Relations in SDRT176
4.2.5 Conclusion182
4.3 Discourse Topic182
4.3.1 Discourse Topic as Entity184
4.3.2 Discourse Topic as Proposition184
4.3.3 Discourse Topic as Question188
4.3.3.1 Contrastive Sentence Topics188
4.3.3.2 Topic-Comment Structures for Discourses190
4.3.3.3 Quaestio Theory192
4.3.3.4 Questions Under Discussion194
4.3.4 Conclusion195
5 Discourse Interpretation198
5.1 Discourse Interpretation as Abduction198
5.1.1 Flat Logical Forms199
5.1.2 Weighted Abduction200
5.1.3 Local Pragmatic Interpretation203
5.1.4 Abduction in Structured Discourses204
5.1.5 Conclusion208
5.2 Minimal Model Generation210
5.2.1 Herbrand Models for First-Order Languages210
5.2.2 Generation of Discourse Models212
5.2.3 Minimality of Models215
5.2.4 Minimal Models and Discourse Anaphora217
5.2.4.1 Resolving Pronouns by Model Generation217
5.2.4.2 Equality by Default220
5.2.5 Conclusion223
5.3 Segmented Discourse Representation Theory224
5.3.1 Representing Discourse Structures225
5.3.2 Constructing Discourse Structures228
5.3.2.1 The Logic of Underspecified Information Content228
5.3.2.2 The Glue Logic229
5.3.2.3 Discourse Update233
5.3.2.4 Constraining Attachment234
5.3.2.5 Maximize Discourse Coherence236
5.3.3 Conclusion237
6 Bridging Inferences240
6.1 Bridging Anaphora240
6.1.1 A Preliminary Classification241