| Preface | 5 |
|---|
| Contents | 9 |
|---|
| Contributors | 11 |
|---|
| About the Authors | 13 |
|---|
| 1 GDSS Past, Present, and Future | 21 |
|---|
| 1.1 Introduction | 21 |
| 1.2 Overview of GDSS by Paul Gray | 21 |
| 1.2.1 The Forerunner | 22 |
| 1.2.2 The Churchill War Room | 23 |
| 1.2.3 Engelbart's Decision Room at SRI (ca. 1967) | 24 |
| 1.2.4 University of Southern California (USC) | 25 |
| 1.2.5 Southern Methodist University (SMU) | 25 |
| 1.2.6 Claremont Graduate University | 25 |
| 1.2.7 Other Rooms | 26 |
| 1.3 The Role of Leaders in GDSS by Bob Johansen | 27 |
| 1.4 Global Teams by Jay Nunamaker | 30 |
| 1.4.1 Collaboration | 30 |
| 1.4.2 Challenges Facing Global Virtual Teams | 31 |
| 1.4.3 Trade-Offs | 32 |
| 1.4.4 Effective Collaboration | 33 |
| 1.4.5 Conclusions | 33 |
| 1.5 The Entrepreneurial View by Gerald R. Wagner | 34 |
| 1.5.1 The Planning Laboratory | 35 |
| 1.5.2 Next Version | 35 |
| 1.5.3 Vision Quest, Web IQ | 36 |
| 1.5.4 Reincarnation of IFPS | 37 |
| 1.5.5 Concluding Thoughts | 37 |
| 1.6 Telepresence by Jeff Rodman | 38 |
| 1.6.1 Definition | 38 |
| 1.6.2 What Is in This Section | 39 |
| 1.6.3 Telepresence Drivers, 2010--2030 | 39 |
| 1.6.4 The Telepresence Vision | 40 |
| 1.6.5 Technical Enablers | 42 |
| 1.6.6 Summary | 44 |
| 2 Reflections on the Past and Future of Decision Support Systems: Perspective of Eleven Pioneers | 45 |
|---|
| 2.1 Introduction | 45 |
| 2.2 DSS Research and Development Timeline | 46 |
| 2.3 Reflections on Decision Support Pioneers Research Project | 49 |
| 2.4 Reflections of DSS Pioneers | 50 |
| 2.4.1 Major Conclusions from Experiences with Computerized DSS | 51 |
| 2.4.2 Continuing Issues Associated with Decision Support | 54 |
| 2.5 Conclusions | 62 |
| Appendix: Brief Biographies of Interviewees | 64 |
| References | 66 |
| Further Readings | 68 |
| 3 The Intellectual Structure of Decision Support Systems Research (1991-2004) | 69 |
|---|
| 3.1 Introduction | 69 |
| 3.2 Background | 70 |
| 3.3 Data | 71 |
| 3.4 Research Methodology | 72 |
| 3.5 Results of Multivariate Analysis | 73 |
| 3.6 Results of Multi-dimensional Scaling Analysis | 80 |
| 3.7 Limitations | 82 |
| 3.8 Conclusions | 82 |
| References | 83 |
| 4 Ethical Decision-Making and Implications for Decision Support | 89 |
|---|
| 4.1 Introduction | 89 |
| 4.2 Background | 89 |
| 4.2.1 The Ethical Decision-Making Process: A Jones Perspective | 91 |
| 4.3 Measuring Ethical Decision-Making Components | 94 |
| 4.3.1 Recognition of a Moral Issue | 94 |
| 4.3.2 Make a Moral Judgment | 95 |
| 4.3.3 Establish a Moral Intent | 96 |
| 4.3.4 Engage in Moral Behavior | 96 |
| 4.3.5 Moral Intensity and Other Factors | 97 |
| 4.3.6 Measuring Ethical Decision Processes | 97 |
| 4.4 Decision Support Considerations | 99 |
| References | 100 |
| 5 Web and Mobile Spatial Decision Support as Innovations: Comparison of United States and Hong Kong, China | 103 |
|---|
| 5.1 Introduction | 103 |
| 5.1.1 Background | 103 |
| 5.1.2 Issues, Controversies, Problems | 105 |
| 5.2 Theories of Adoption and Diffusion | 106 |
| 5.3 Research Propositions | 109 |
| 5.3.1 There Are Significant Advantages to the Web and Mobile SDS over the Traditional SDS Approach | 109 |
| 5.3.2 The WMSDS Innovation Helps the Organization Competitively | 110 |
| 5.3.3 The Organization Can Adjust Well to the Innovation of WMSDS | 110 |
| 5.3.4 The Innovation Is User-Friendly for Customers and Internal Users | 110 |
| 5.3.5 In Development, the WMSDS Innovation Is Prototyped or Piloted in Small Segments | 111 |
| 5.3.6 The WMSDS Innovation Is Visible Within and Outside the Organization | 111 |
| 5.3.7 WMSDS Differs in Its Innovation Features Between the US and Hong Kong | 111 |
| 5.4 Methodology | 112 |
| 5.4.1 Case Studies | 112 |
| 5.5 Findings | 112 |
| 5.5.1 Decision Support | 113 |
| 5.5.2 Findings on Differences Between US WMSDS and Hong Kong WMSDS for the Case Organizations | 113 |
| 5.5.2.1 Difference in Systems Development of Web-Based SDS | 121 |
| 5.5.2.2 Difference in WMSDS Application Areas | 121 |
| 5.5.2.3 3-D Applications | 122 |
| 5.6 Outcomes for the Research Propositions | 123 |
| 5.6.1 There Are Significant Advantages to the Web and Mobile SDS Over the Old Approach? | 123 |
| 5.6.2 WMSDS Innovation Helps the Organization Competitively | 124 |
| 5.6.3 The Organization Can Adjust Well to the Innovation of WMSDS | 124 |
| 5.6.4 The Innovation Is User-Friendly for Customers and Internal Users | 124 |
| 5.6.5 In Development, the WMSDS Innovation Is Prototyped or Piloted in Small Segments | 124 |
| 5.6.6 The WMSDS Innovation Is Visible Within and Outside the Organization? | 125 |
| 5.6.7 WMSDS Differs in Its Innovation Features Between the US and Hong Kong | 125 |
| 5.7 Case Findings and the Usefulness of the Research Models of Adoption and Use | 126 |
| 5.8 Future Trends | 127 |
| 5.8.1 Technology and Data | 127 |
| 5.9 Conclusion | 129 |
| References | 129 |
| 6 Knowledge Management Capability in Education | 132 |
|---|
| 6.1 Introduction | 132 |
| 6.2 Educational Background | 133 |
| 6.3 Knowledge Management Capability Background | 134 |
| 6.3.1 Defining Knowledge | 134 |
| 6.3.2 Knowledge Processes | 135 |
| 6.3.3 Knowledge Management Capability Constructs | 136 |
| 6.3.4 Knowledge Management Capability Model | 137 |
| 6.4 Expanding K
|