| 138516_1_En_BookFrontmatter_OnlinePDF | 1 |
|---|
| The Pedagogy of Physical Science | 3 |
| Acknowledgements | 5 |
| About the Authors | 6 |
| 138516_1_En_1_Chapter_OnlinePDF | 11 |
|---|
| Chapter 1 | 11 |
| Introduction | 11 |
| 138516_1_En_2_Chapter_OnlinePDF | 16 |
|---|
| Chapter 2 | 16 |
| Conceptual Change and Learning About Forces | 16 |
| 2.1 The Challenge of Learning About Forces and Motion | 16 |
| 2.2 Conceptual Change: A Brief Historical Perspective | 17 |
| 2.2.1 The Influence of Piaget | 18 |
| 2.2.2 The ‘Classical’ Model of Conceptual Change | 19 |
| 2.2.3 Developing Knowledge and Understanding of Learners’ Conceptions in Science | 20 |
| 2.2.4 Some Theoretical Models of Conceptual Change | 21 |
| 2.2.5 Considering the Individual’s World | 23 |
| 2.3 Conceptual Change in Action: Primary Teachers Learning About Forces | 26 |
| 2.3.1 Forces Within the Context of Floating and Sinking | 26 |
| 2.3.2 The Socio-Cultural Environment and the Role of the Tutor | 27 |
| 2.3.3 Learning in Action: Floating and Sinking | 29 |
| 2.3.4 Initial Ideas | 29 |
| 2.3.5 Constructing and Reviewing Hypotheses | 30 |
| 2.3.6 Developing a Forces View of Floating and Sinking | 32 |
| 2.3.7 Generalising Weight for Size | 33 |
| 2.3.8 Understanding Forces in Different Contexts – Towards Context Independent Learning | 34 |
| 2.3.9 The Arched Bridge | 36 |
| 2.3.10 The Parachutist | 38 |
| 2.4 Some Conclusions and Implications | 40 |
| 2.4.1 Reflections on the Development a Qualitative Understanding of Force and Motion | 40 |
| 2.4.2 Developing Pedagogical Insight Through Employing a Metacognitive Approach to Learning | 44 |
| 2.4.3 Some Implications for Teacher Education | 46 |
| 138516_1_En_3_Chapter_OnlinePDF | 47 |
|---|
| Chapter 3 | 47 |
| The Role of Analogies in Learning | 47 |
| 3.1 Learning About Simple Circuits | 48 |
| 3.2 Applying Analogies to Simple Circuits | 50 |
| 3.2.1 Analogies Deployed | 50 |
| 3.2.1.1 Analogy 1 | 50 |
| 3.2.1.2 Analogy 2 | 51 |
| 3.2.1.3 Analogy 3 | 51 |
| 3.2.2 Synopsis of Research Findings | 52 |
| 3.2.2.1 Initial Ideas About a Simple Circuit (Fig. 3.1) | 52 |
| 3.2.2.2 Analogy 1 (Fig. 3.3) | 53 |
| 3.2.2.3 Analogy 2 (Fig. 3.3) | 53 |
| 3.2.2.4 Applying Analogy 2 to Two Bulbs Wired in Series | 54 |
| 3.2.2.5 Analogy 3 (Fig. 3.3) | 55 |
| 3.2.3 Tracking Learning Within the Groups | 56 |
| 3.2.3.1 Group A | 56 |
| 3.2.3.2 Group D | 56 |
| 3.2.3.3 Group C | 57 |
| 3.3 Implications for Pedagogy | 58 |
| 3.3.1 The Problem of Analogies in Developing a Sequential View of Simple Circuits | 58 |
| 3.4 Explanation and Meaning | 62 |
| 3.4.1 The Appropriation of Hermeneutics | 63 |
| 3.4.2 Exemplification of Language and Meaning | 63 |
| 3.4.3 Alternative Perspectives on Knowledge Acquisition | 65 |
| 3.4.4 Partitioning and Sequencing | 67 |
| 3.4.5 The Presentation of Science Knowledge in Science Education | 67 |
| 3.5 Practical Implications for Pedagogy: Learning | 69 |
| 3.6 Practical Implications for Pedagogy: Teaching | 70 |
| 3.7 Teacher Subject and Pedagogic Knowledge | 71 |
| 138516_1_En_4_Chapter_OnlinePDF | 73 |
|---|
| Chapter 4 | 73 |
| Cognitive Conflict and the Formation of Shadows | 73 |
| 4.1 Promoting Conceptual Change Through Cognitive Conflict | 74 |
| 4.1.1 The Role of Cognitive Conflict in Learning Science | 74 |
| 4.1.2 Some Limitations of the Cognitive Conflict Strategy | 74 |
| 4.2 The Challenge Presented by the Conceptual Domain of Light | 76 |
| 4.3 Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Conflict in Learning About Shadows | 77 |
| 4.3.1 Background to the Exemplification Study | 77 |
| 4.3.2 The Cognitive Conflict Scenarios | 78 |
| 4.3.2.1 Scenario 1 – Two Light Sources, One Object (Fig. 4.1a) | 78 |
| 4.3.2.2 Scenario 2 – Multiple Light Sources (Fig. 4.1b) | 78 |
| 4.3.2.3 Scenario 3 – Using a Cross-Shaped Light Source (Fig. 4.1c) | 78 |
| 4.3.3 Learner Responses to the Cognitive Conflict Scenarios | 80 |
| 4.3.3.1 Initial Conceptions About Shadow Formation | 80 |
| 4.3.4 Categories of Responses to the Cognitive Conflict Scenarios (1–3) | 81 |
| 4.3.4.1 Responses to Scenario 1 | 82 |
| 4.3.4.2 Responses to Scenario 2 | 84 |
| 4.3.4.3 Responses to Scenario 3 | 85 |
| 4.3.5 Triggering Meaningful Cognitive Conflict | 86 |
| 4.4 Resolving the Conflict | 86 |
| 4.4.1 The Need to Generate Causal Explanation | 86 |
| 4.4.2 Resolving the Cognitive Conflict Caused by the Cross-Shaped Shadow | 87 |
| 4.5 The Emergence of Pedagogical Insight | 91 |
| 4.5.1 The Learning Process | 91 |
| 4.5.2 Pedagogy Relating to Light | 95 |
| 4.5.3 Pedagogical Implications for Future Practice | 96 |
| 4.6 Discussion | 96 |
| 4.7 Some Concluding Remarks | 98 |
| 138516_1_En_5_Chapter_OnlinePDF | 100 |
|---|
| Chapter 5 | 100 |
| Language Interpretation and Meaning | 100 |
| 5.1 Conceptualising How Language Works | 101 |
| 5.1.1 A Brief Look at Language as a System or Structure | 101 |
| 5.2 Sign and Signification | 102 |
| 5.3 Signification in Science Learning | 103 |
| 5.3.1 Paradigm Constraints in Reasoning | 105 |
| 5.3.2 The Relational Value of the Sign | 106 |
| 5.4 Interpretation and Meaning | 109 |
| 5.4.1 What Counts for Text? | 110 |
| 5.4.2 Language and Accessing the World (Electricity) | 111 |
| 5.4.3 Possibilities and Constraints | 111 |
| 5.4.4 Shaping the Ontological Landscape | 114 |
| 5.4.5 Distancing | 118 |
| 138516_1_En_6_Chapter_OnlinePDF | 120 |
|---|
| Chapter 6 | 120 |
| Metacognition and Developing Understanding of Simple Astronomical Events | 120 |
| 6.1 Metacognition and Learning | 120 |
| 6.1.1 What Is Meant by Metacognition? | 120 |
| 6.1.2 The Relevance of Developing Metacognitive Awareness of Learning in Teacher Education | 122 |
| 6.2 The Conceptual Domain of the Earth and Beyond | 123 |
| 6.2.1 The Cognitive and Pedagogical Challenge of Developing Causal Explanations of Simple Astronomical Events | 123 |
| 6.2.2 Using a Metacognitive Approach to Generating Subject and Pedagogical Knowledge | 126 |
| 6.3 Mapping Movement in Conceptual Understanding About Simple Astronomical Events | 128 |
| 6.3.1 The Day–Night Cycle | 128 |
| 6.3.2 The Seasons | 130 |