| Contents | 4 |
|---|
| 1 Introduction to Water Circulation in Rocks | 7 |
|---|
| 1.1 General Observations | 7 |
| 1.2 Origin of Discontinuities | 8 |
| 1.3 Features of Discontinuities | 9 |
| 1.3.1 Orientation | 10 |
| 1.3.2 Degree of Fracturing | 12 |
| 1.3.3 Persistence | 14 |
| 1.3.4 Aperture and Filling | 15 |
| 1.3.5 Roughness | 16 |
| 1.3.6 Weathering | 18 |
| 1.3.7 Moisture Conditions and Seepage | 18 |
| 1.4 Graphical Representation of Discontinuities | 19 |
| 1.4.1 Equal Areal Projections | 20 |
| 1.4.2 Equal Angle Projections | 22 |
| 1.5 Basic Elements for Hydrogeological Conceptual Model Definition | 25 |
| 1.5.1 The Work Scale | 27 |
| 1.5.2 Elementary Representative Volume | 28 |
| 1.5.3 Changing of Fracturing Degree with Depth | 29 |
| 1.6 Probabilistic Generation of Discontinuity Network | 29 |
| 2 Hydraulic Conductivity Assessment | 34 |
|---|
| 2.1 Introduction | 34 |
| 2.2 Deterministic Methodologies | 34 |
| 2.2.1 Hydraulic Conductivity Along a Single Fracture | 34 |
| 2.2.2 Hydraulic Conductivity Along a Fracture System | 37 |
| 2.2.3 Hydraulic Conductivity Tensor | 38 |
| 2.2.4 Equivalent Hydraulic Conductivity | 40 |
| 2.3 Probabilistic Methodologies: Percolation Theory | 41 |
| 2.4 In Situ Tests | 45 |
| 2.4.1 Lugeon Tests | 46 |
| 2.4.2 Hydrogeochemical Methods | 47 |
| 2.4.2.1 Traditional Geochemical Methods | 47 |
| 2.4.2.2 Methods with Artificial Tracers | 48 |
| 2.4.2.3 Isotopic Methods | 49 |
| 2.4.3 Hydraulic Tests in Double-Porosity Aquifers | 49 |
| 2.4.4 Hydraulic Tests in Anisotropic Aquifers | 51 |
| 3 Influence of Joint Features on Rock Mass Hydraulic Conductivity | 54 |
|---|
| 3.1 Introduction | 54 |
| 3.2 Influence of Joint Roughness | 54 |
| 3.2.1 Effects of Roughness on Hydraulic Conductivity of a Single Joint: Theoretical Analysis | 55 |
| 3.2.2 Effects of Roughness on Hydraulic Conductivity of a Single Joint: Experimental Checking | 58 |
| 3.2.3 Effects of Roughness on Rock Mass Hydraulic Conductivity | 61 |
| 3.3 Influence of Joint Aperture | 63 |
| 3.3.1 Changes in Aperture with Depth | 64 |
| 3.3.2 Changes in Aperture with the Stress Field | 68 |
| 3.4 Influence of Joint Spacing and Frequency | 72 |
| 3.5 Joints Interconnection | 74 |
| 4 Main Flow Direction in Rock Masses | 78 |
|---|
| 4.1 Introduction | 78 |
| 4.2 Anisotropy of the Fractured Medium | 78 |
| 4.3 Main Flow Direction in Fractured Media | 81 |
| 4.4 Non-saturated Medium | 82 |
| 4.5 Non-saturated Medium: Main Flow Direction with an Impermeable Layer | 86 |
| 4.6 Saturated Medium | 87 |
| 4.6.1 Known Hydraulic Gradient | 88 |
| 4.6.2 Unknown Hydraulic Gradient | 89 |
| 5 Methods and Models to Simulate the Groundwater Flow in Rock Masses | 91 |
|---|
| 5.1 Introduction | 91 |
| 5.2 Basic Elements of a Modeling Approach | 91 |
| 5.2.1 Definition of the Conceptual Model | 93 |
| 5.2.2 The Model Project | 94 |
| 5.2.3 Choice of the Numerical Code | 94 |
| 5.3 Darcys Model | 95 |
| 5.4 Discrete Models | 97 |
| 5.5 Dual Porosity Models | 101 |
| 6 Case Histories | 104 |
|---|
| 6.1 Groundwater Flow and Slope Stability | 104 |
| 6.2 Evaluation of the Hydrogeological Risk Linked with Tunneling | 111 |
| 6.2.1 Reconstruction of the Groundwater Flow | 113 |
| 6.2.2 Estimation of the Tunnel Inflow | 114 |
| 6.2.3 Delimitation of the Tunnel Influence Zone | 119 |
| 6.2.4 Hydrogeological Risk Analysis | 126 |
| 6.3 Hydrogeological Risk Linked with Road Construction | 130 |
| 6.4 Mountain Aquifer Exploitation and Safeguard: Eva Verda Basin Case Study (Saint Marcel, Aosta Valley, Italy) | 138 |
| 6.4.1 Hydrogeological Reconstruction | 141 |
| 6.5 Stochastic Groundwater Modeling for the Drying Risk Assessment | 147 |
| 6.5.1 Hydrogeological Setting of the Study Area | 148 |
| 6.5.2 Groundwater Model of the Nossana Spring | 150 |
| 6.5.3 Factors Involved in the Depletion Curve | 154 |
| 6.5.4 Drying Risk Assessment | 156 |
| References | 158 |
|---|
| Index | 166 |