| Acknowledgments | 6 |
|---|
| Contents | 8 |
|---|
| List of Figures | 16 |
|---|
| List of Tables | 17 |
|---|
| Introduction: The Scientific Research Programme into Learning Science | 18 |
|---|
| A Focus on Formal Science Education | 19 |
| It Does Not Matter What Is Taught in Science Lessons! | 19 |
| Individual Learners Are an Important Focus | 20 |
| The Structure of the Book | 20 |
| Science Education As a Research Field Within a Domain of Enquiry | 24 |
|---|
| 1.1 A Research Topic: Learning Science | 24 |
| 1.2 Sharing Meanings for Key Terms | 26 |
| 1.3 Locating the Research Topic in a ‘Field of Study’ | 33 |
| 1.4 The Domain of Enquiry – Background to the Field | 36 |
| 1.5 Philosophical Views on Learning | 38 |
| 1.6 Influences from Psychological Studies of Development | 41 |
| 1.7 Studies of Cognition | 51 |
| 1.8 Structure of Mind | 56 |
| 1.9 Approaches to Instruction and Pedagogy | 60 |
| 1.10 The Field: Research in Science Education | 63 |
| ‘Scientific’ Research in Education | 67 |
|---|
| 2.1 The Notion of Educational Science | 67 |
| 2.2 A Post-Positivist View of Science | 69 |
| 2.3 Scientific Method | 75 |
| 2.4 The Role of Theory in Scientific Research | 81 |
| 2.5 Experimental and Naturalistic Research in Science | 83 |
| 2.6 Research Paradigms in Education | 86 |
| 2.7 Scientific Research in Education | 93 |
| A Model of Science: Lakatos and Scientific Research Programmes | 95 |
|---|
| 3.1 Lakatos: An Alternative to Popper and Kuhn | 95 |
| 3.2 Paradigms As a Unit of Analysis in Science | 97 |
| 3.3 Criticisms of Kuhn’s Model | 102 |
| 3.4 Parallels Between Science and Science Education? | 107 |
| 3.5 Lakatos and RP As Units of Analysis | 108 |
| 3.6 The Key Features of a SRP | 109 |
| 3.7 Refutation in RP | 114 |
| 3.8 Evaluating RP | 116 |
| 3.9 Relating Paradigms, Programmes and Frameworks | 118 |
| 3.10 Scientific RP and the Social Sciences | 119 |
| 3.11 The Origins of a RP | 124 |
| 3.12 Summary | 126 |
| A Scientific Research Programme Within Science Education | 127 |
|---|
| 4.1 Constructivism As a Research Orthodoxy in Science Education | 127 |
| 4.2 The ‘Alternative Conceptions Movement’ | 133 |
| 4.3 Conceptualisations of the Research Programme | 135 |
| 4.4 Characterising the Research Programme | 138 |
| 4.5 Knowledge Construction | 141 |
| 4.6 The ‘Transfer’ Model of Learning | 142 |
| 4.7 How Does Knowledge Construction (i.e. Learning) Take Place? | 146 |
| 4.8 Learners’ Scientific Ideas | 147 |
| 4.9 Implications for Learning | 149 |
| 4.10 Implications for Teaching | 152 |
| 4.11 Learners’ Knowledge Structures | 154 |
| 4.12 Individual Differences | 158 |
| 4.13 Researchers’ Representations | 160 |
| 4.14 Applying the Model of the RP | 161 |
| The Negative Heuristic and Criticisms of Constructivism in Science Education | 163 |
|---|
| 5.1 Constructivism As Culturally Imperialist Movement That Is damaging to Many Traditional Cultures | 164 |
| 5.2 The Philosophical Stance of the Constructivist Programme | 176 |
| 5.3 The Status of Theory in the RP | 199 |
| 5.4 The Social Constructivist Perspective | 207 |
| 5.5 The Research–Practice Interface | 215 |
| 5.6 Constructivism in Science Education As a Degenerate RP | 232 |
| Building the Protective Belt of the Progressive Research Programme | 234 |
|---|
| 6.1 Students Understanding Science | 236 |
| 6.2 Students Learning Science | 278 |
| 6.3 Teachers Teaching Science | 313 |
| 6.4 To What Extent Has the RP Addressed the Issues Set Out in the Positive Heuristic? | 329 |
| The Positive Heuristic: Directions for Progressing the Field | 340 |
|---|
| 7.1 What We Know Now | 342 |
| 7.2 The Continuing Challenge for the RP | 343 |
| 7.3 Complexity: The Need to Study Individual Learners in Depth | 345 |
| 7.4 Generalisability: The Value of the Methodological Pendulum | 352 |
| 7.5 Learning As a Process: The Need to Study Change | 354 |
| 7.6 Teaching As Facilitation of Learning: The Need to Study Learning in Classroom Contexts | 360 |
| 7.7 Natural Experiments: The Need to Compare Across Educational Contexts | 362 |
| 7.8 Bringing It All Together: A Progressive Methodological Pendulum? | 366 |
| 7.9 Constructivism, Contingency and the Progressive Research Programme | 370 |
| Final Thoughts: Is There Really a RP, and Does It Matter? | 372 |
|---|
| Does the Programme Exist? | 372 |
| Has the RP Been Correctly Delineated? | 373 |
| Does It Matter if Judgements About the RP Are Disputed? | 374 |
| References | 375 |
|---|
| Name Index | 399 |
|---|
| Subject Index | 405 |