: Keith S. Taber
: Progressing Science Education Constructing the Scientific Research Programme into the Contingent Nature of Learning Science
: Springer-Verlag
: 9789048124312
: 1
: CHF 132.90
:
: Erwachsenenbildung
: English
: 400
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF

Exploring one of the central themes in science education theory, this volume examines how science education can be considered as a scientific activity within a broad post-positivist notion of science.

Many students find learning science extremely problematic, whatever level of education they have reached. At the end of the 1970s a new approach to tackling learning difficulties in science was developed, drawing on ideas from psychology and cognitive science, and centred on the way students build up new knowledge in reference to their existing ideas. 'Constructivism' became the dominant paradigm in science education research for two decades, spawning a vast body of literature reporting aspects of learners' ideas in different science topics. However, Constructivism came under fire as it was recognised that the research did not offer immediate and simple prescriptions for effective science teaching. The whole approach was widely criticised, in particular by those who saw it as having 'anti-science' leanings.

In this book, the notion of scientific research programmes is used to understand the development, limitations and potential of constructivism. It is shown that constructivist work in science education fits into a coherent programme exploring the contingencies of learning science. The author goes further to address criticisms of constructivism; evaluate progress in the field; and suggest directions for future research. It is concluded that constructivism has provided the foundations for a progressive research programme that continues to guide enquiry into learning and teaching science.

Acknowledgments6
Contents8
List of Figures16
List of Tables17
Introduction: The Scientific Research Programme into Learning Science18
A Focus on Formal Science Education19
It Does Not Matter What Is Taught in Science Lessons!19
Individual Learners Are an Important Focus20
The Structure of the Book20
Science Education As a Research Field Within a Domain of Enquiry24
1.1 A Research Topic: Learning Science24
1.2 Sharing Meanings for Key Terms26
1.3 Locating the Research Topic in a ‘Field of Study’33
1.4 The Domain of Enquiry – Background to the Field36
1.5 Philosophical Views on Learning38
1.6 Influences from Psychological Studies of Development41
1.7 Studies of Cognition51
1.8 Structure of Mind56
1.9 Approaches to Instruction and Pedagogy60
1.10 The Field: Research in Science Education63
‘Scientific’ Research in Education67
2.1 The Notion of Educational Science67
2.2 A Post-Positivist View of Science69
2.3 Scientific Method75
2.4 The Role of Theory in Scientific Research81
2.5 Experimental and Naturalistic Research in Science83
2.6 Research Paradigms in Education86
2.7 Scientific Research in Education93
A Model of Science: Lakatos and Scientific Research Programmes95
3.1 Lakatos: An Alternative to Popper and Kuhn95
3.2 Paradigms As a Unit of Analysis in Science97
3.3 Criticisms of Kuhn’s Model102
3.4 Parallels Between Science and Science Education?107
3.5 Lakatos and RP As Units of Analysis108
3.6 The Key Features of a SRP109
3.7 Refutation in RP114
3.8 Evaluating RP116
3.9 Relating Paradigms, Programmes and Frameworks118
3.10 Scientific RP and the Social Sciences119
3.11 The Origins of a RP124
3.12 Summary126
A Scientific Research Programme Within Science Education127
4.1 Constructivism As a Research Orthodoxy in Science Education127
4.2 The ‘Alternative Conceptions Movement’133
4.3 Conceptualisations of the Research Programme135
4.4 Characterising the Research Programme138
4.5 Knowledge Construction141
4.6 The ‘Transfer’ Model of Learning142
4.7 How Does Knowledge Construction (i.e. Learning) Take Place?146
4.8 Learners’ Scientific Ideas147
4.9 Implications for Learning149
4.10 Implications for Teaching152
4.11 Learners’ Knowledge Structures154
4.12 Individual Differences158
4.13 Researchers’ Representations160
4.14 Applying the Model of the RP161
The Negative Heuristic and Criticisms of Constructivism in Science Education163
5.1 Constructivism As Culturally Imperialist Movement That Is damaging to Many Traditional Cultures164
5.2 The Philosophical Stance of the Constructivist Programme176
5.3 The Status of Theory in the RP199
5.4 The Social Constructivist Perspective207
5.5 The Research–Practice Interface215
5.6 Constructivism in Science Education As a Degenerate RP232
Building the Protective Belt of the Progressive Research Programme234
6.1 Students Understanding Science236
6.2 Students Learning Science278
6.3 Teachers Teaching Science313
6.4 To What Extent Has the RP Addressed the Issues Set Out in the Positive Heuristic?329
The Positive Heuristic: Directions for Progressing the Field340
7.1 What We Know Now342
7.2 The Continuing Challenge for the RP343
7.3 Complexity: The Need to Study Individual Learners in Depth345
7.4 Generalisability: The Value of the Methodological Pendulum352
7.5 Learning As a Process: The Need to Study Change354
7.6 Teaching As Facilitation of Learning: The Need to Study Learning in Classroom Contexts360
7.7 Natural Experiments: The Need to Compare Across Educational Contexts362
7.8 Bringing It All Together: A Progressive Methodological Pendulum?366
7.9 Constructivism, Contingency and the Progressive Research Programme370
Final Thoughts: Is There Really a RP, and Does It Matter?372
Does the Programme Exist?372
Has the RP Been Correctly Delineated?373
Does It Matter if Judgements About the RP Are Disputed?374
References375
Name Index399
Subject Index405