: Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Sabine Maasen, Monika Kurath, Mario Kaiser
: Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter
: Governing Future Technologies Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime
: Springer-Verlag
: 9789048128341
: 1
: CHF 85.40
:
: Naturwissenschaften allgemein
: English
: 314
: Wasserzeichen
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF

Nanotechnology has been the subject of extensive 'assessment hype,' unlike any previous field of research and development. A multiplicity of stakeholders have started to analyze the implications of nanotechnology: Technology assessment institutions around the world, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, re-insurance companies, and academics from science and technology studies and applied ethics have turned their attention to this growing field's implications. In the course of these assessment efforts, a social phenomenon has emerged - a phenomenon the editors define as assessment regime.

Despite the variety of organizations, methods, and actors involved in the evaluation and regulation of emerging nanotechnologies, the assessment activities comply with an overarching scientific and political imperative: Innovations are only welcome if they are assessed against the criteria of safety, sustainability, desirability, and acceptability. So far, such deliberations and reflections have played only a subordinate role. This book argues that with the rise of the nanotechnology assessment regime, however, things have changed dramatically: Situated at the crossroads of democratizing science and technology, good governance, and the quest for sustainable innovations, the assessment regime has become constitutive for technological development.

The contributions in this book explore and critically analyse nanotechnology's assessment regime: To what extent is it constitutive for technology in general, for nanotechnology in particular? What social conditions render the regime a phenomenon sui generis? And what are its implications for science and society?

Acknowledgments5
Contents6
List of Contributors8
Introduction: Governing Future Technologies10
Part I Going Nano: Opportunities and Risks24
Reinventing a Laboratory: Nanotechnology as a Resource for Organizational Change26
1 Introduction: Scientific Fields and Organizations26
2 Formation and Crises: History of a Testing Institute28
3 Shift: Addressing the Nano-Scale30
3.1 Economy of Promises and Performance Indicators30
3.2 Organizational Alignment: Recruitment, NANO 1 and NANO 231
4 Differentiation: Strategies to Rethink Testing33
4.1 Reduction and Devaluation of Testing33
4.2 Reinterpretation and Repositioning of Testing34
4.3 Re-Valorization of Service35
5 Integration: Shaping the Contours of Nanotechnology36
5.1 ELSI, EHS, and Finance: The Case of the NanoConvention36
5.2 Public Understanding of Science: The Case of NanoPubli37
6 Conclusions38
7 Epilogue40
References41
Negotiating Nano: From Assessing Risks to Disciplinary Transformations43
1 Introduction: Identity Discourses and Assessment Dilemmas43
2 Strategies, Facing Problematic Identities44
2.1 Relegation to the Future45
2.2 Evading the Problem by Definitions and Representations46
2.3 Self-Reflection in the Social Sciences and Ethics47
2.4 Asking the Public47
2.5 Delegation to Toxicological Risk Research49
3 Transformation Processes in Toxicology49
3.1 The Significance of Doing ''Nano'': Negotiating Novelty50
3.2 The Significance of Being ''nano'': Reflections on Function and Expectations53
4 Assessment Transforming Disciplines?54
4.1 Toxicology as a Nanoscience?54
4.2 Disciplines Assessed55
References56
Nanoscience is 100 Years Old. The Defensive Appropriation of the Nanotechnology Discourse within the Disciplinary Boundaries of Crystallography59
1 Strong Traditions and Weak Positions in Crystallography61
2 Discursive Limits at the Nanoscale63
3 Networking a New Identity68
4 Conclusions72
References73
Part II Making Sense: Visions, Images, and Video Games76
From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create it78
1 Introduction78
2 The Rhetoric of Nano-Convergence79
2.1 Convergence-as-Fact79
2.2 Convergence-by-Higher-Necessity81
2.3 Convergence-as-Opportunity82
3 NBIC-Convergence83
3.1 From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence83
3.2 The Ideas and Articulations of NBIC-Convergence84
3.3 The Friends of NBIC-Convergence86
4 Analysis: Convergence as a Teleological Concept88
5 Conclusion: New Challenges for STS90
References91
Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence93
1 Nanotechnology and the Convergence of Visions93
2 Aprs La Lutte: The Return of Posthumanism95
3 The Politics of Nanoconvergence and Human Enhancement96
4 Shortcomings and Obstacles in the Deliberation of Visions102
References104
Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular Nano-Discourse as an Effect of Increasing Economization108
1 Introduction108
2 Futuristic Images and Contemporary Images of the Future110
3 Empirical Observations and Analysis of the Images Mediality112
3.1 The Process of Visual Defuturization (Mass Media Publications)112
3.2 Defuturized Images at Work (Research Policy Brochures for the Public)116
4 Theoretical Interpretation of the Observed Phenomena119
4.1 Defuturization as an Effect of Increasing Economization119
4.2 Images as the Powerful Drivers Behind the Familiarization Processes122
5 Conclusion123
References125
Digital Matters: Video Games and the Cultural Transcoding of Nanotechnology128
References143
Part III Assessing Nano: Repercussions on Research147
Emerging De Facto Agendas Surrounding Nanotechnology: Two Cases Full of Contingencies, Lock-outs, and Lock-ins149
1 Introduction and Conceptualization149
2 The Drexler Saga153
3 Health, Environmental, and Safety Aspects of Nanoparticles161
4 In Conclusion167
References169
The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles: Contribution to a Normalisation of the Science/Society Relationship?174
1 Introduction and Overview174
2 The SST Approach176
3 The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles177
4 Observations and Interpretations181
4.1 Nanoparticles and the Strong Social Constructivist Position181
4.2 What about ''Formation of Technology'' in the nanoparticle Story?182
4.3 The Normalisation Hypothesis184
5 The Institutional Case: Nanotechnology and Technology Assessment at FZK185
6 Conclusions190
References191
Futures Assessed: How Technology Assessment, Ethics and Think Tanks Make Sense of an Unknown Future195
1 The Assessment Regime: Damned to Explore the Future195
2 The Discursivity of Futures196
3 The Assessment Regime: Making the Future Decidable198
4 Articulations and Representations of the Future199
5 From Future to Futures: The Case of the Royal Society200
5.1 Institutions and Reports: Mutual Dependencies200
5.2 A Report's Recommendations: The Delegation of Futures202
5.3 The Delegated Futures of Technology Assessment203
6 From Future to Futures: The Case of Nano-Ethics204
6.1 The Academic Discourse of Ethics205
6.2 Nano-Ethics: Preparing Preparedness for Futures in the Present206
7 From Futures to Present: The Case of a Think Tank208
7.1 From Future to Expectations209
7.2 The Democratization of Futures210
8 Conclusions211
References212
Part IV Assessing Dialogue: Governing Nano by ELSI214