| Acknowledgments | 5 |
|---|
| Contents | 6 |
|---|
| List of Contributors | 8 |
|---|
| Introduction: Governing Future Technologies | 10 |
|---|
| Part I Going Nano: Opportunities and Risks | 24 |
|---|
| Reinventing a Laboratory: Nanotechnology as a Resource for Organizational Change | 26 |
| 1 Introduction: Scientific Fields and Organizations | 26 |
| 2 Formation and Crises: History of a Testing Institute | 28 |
| 3 Shift: Addressing the Nano-Scale | 30 |
| 3.1 Economy of Promises and Performance Indicators | 30 |
| 3.2 Organizational Alignment: Recruitment, NANO 1 and NANO 2 | 31 |
| 4 Differentiation: Strategies to Rethink Testing | 33 |
| 4.1 Reduction and Devaluation of Testing | 33 |
| 4.2 Reinterpretation and Repositioning of Testing | 34 |
| 4.3 Re-Valorization of Service | 35 |
| 5 Integration: Shaping the Contours of Nanotechnology | 36 |
| 5.1 ELSI, EHS, and Finance: The Case of the NanoConvention | 36 |
| 5.2 Public Understanding of Science: The Case of NanoPubli | 37 |
| 6 Conclusions | 38 |
| 7 Epilogue | 40 |
| References | 41 |
| Negotiating Nano: From Assessing Risks to Disciplinary Transformations | 43 |
| 1 Introduction: Identity Discourses and Assessment Dilemmas | 43 |
| 2 Strategies, Facing Problematic Identities | 44 |
| 2.1 Relegation to the Future | 45 |
| 2.2 Evading the Problem by Definitions and Representations | 46 |
| 2.3 Self-Reflection in the Social Sciences and Ethics | 47 |
| 2.4 Asking the Public | 47 |
| 2.5 Delegation to Toxicological Risk Research | 49 |
| 3 Transformation Processes in Toxicology | 49 |
| 3.1 The Significance of Doing ''Nano'': Negotiating Novelty | 50 |
| 3.2 The Significance of Being ''nano'': Reflections on Function and Expectations | 53 |
| 4 Assessment Transforming Disciplines? | 54 |
| 4.1 Toxicology as a Nanoscience? | 54 |
| 4.2 Disciplines Assessed | 55 |
| References | 56 |
| Nanoscience is 100 Years Old. The Defensive Appropriation of the Nanotechnology Discourse within the Disciplinary Boundaries of Crystallography | 59 |
| 1 Strong Traditions and Weak Positions in Crystallography | 61 |
| 2 Discursive Limits at the Nanoscale | 63 |
| 3 Networking a New Identity | 68 |
| 4 Conclusions | 72 |
| References | 73 |
| Part II Making Sense: Visions, Images, and Video Games | 76 |
|---|
| From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence: The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Create it | 78 |
| 1 Introduction | 78 |
| 2 The Rhetoric of Nano-Convergence | 79 |
| 2.1 Convergence-as-Fact | 79 |
| 2.2 Convergence-by-Higher-Necessity | 81 |
| 2.3 Convergence-as-Opportunity | 82 |
| 3 NBIC-Convergence | 83 |
| 3.1 From Nano-Convergence to NBIC-Convergence | 83 |
| 3.2 The Ideas and Articulations of NBIC-Convergence | 84 |
| 3.3 The Friends of NBIC-Convergence | 86 |
| 4 Analysis: Convergence as a Teleological Concept | 88 |
| 5 Conclusion: New Challenges for STS | 90 |
| References | 91 |
| Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence | 93 |
| 1 Nanotechnology and the Convergence of Visions | 93 |
| 2 Aprs La Lutte: The Return of Posthumanism | 95 |
| 3 The Politics of Nanoconvergence and Human Enhancement | 96 |
| 4 Shortcomings and Obstacles in the Deliberation of Visions | 102 |
| References | 104 |
| Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular Nano-Discourse as an Effect of Increasing Economization | 108 |
| 1 Introduction | 108 |
| 2 Futuristic Images and Contemporary Images of the Future | 110 |
| 3 Empirical Observations and Analysis of the Images Mediality | 112 |
| 3.1 The Process of Visual Defuturization (Mass Media Publications) | 112 |
| 3.2 Defuturized Images at Work (Research Policy Brochures for the Public) | 116 |
| 4 Theoretical Interpretation of the Observed Phenomena | 119 |
| 4.1 Defuturization as an Effect of Increasing Economization | 119 |
| 4.2 Images as the Powerful Drivers Behind the Familiarization Processes | 122 |
| 5 Conclusion | 123 |
| References | 125 |
| Digital Matters: Video Games and the Cultural Transcoding of Nanotechnology | 128 |
| References | 143 |
| Part III Assessing Nano: Repercussions on Research | 147 |
|---|
| Emerging De Facto Agendas Surrounding Nanotechnology: Two Cases Full of Contingencies, Lock-outs, and Lock-ins | 149 |
| 1 Introduction and Conceptualization | 149 |
| 2 The Drexler Saga | 153 |
| 3 Health, Environmental, and Safety Aspects of Nanoparticles | 161 |
| 4 In Conclusion | 167 |
| References | 169 |
| The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles: Contribution to a Normalisation of the Science/Society Relationship? | 174 |
| 1 Introduction and Overview | 174 |
| 2 The SST Approach | 176 |
| 3 The Risk Debate on Nanoparticles | 177 |
| 4 Observations and Interpretations | 181 |
| 4.1 Nanoparticles and the Strong Social Constructivist Position | 181 |
| 4.2 What about ''Formation of Technology'' in the nanoparticle Story? | 182 |
| 4.3 The Normalisation Hypothesis | 184 |
| 5 The Institutional Case: Nanotechnology and Technology Assessment at FZK | 185 |
| 6 Conclusions | 190 |
| References | 191 |
| Futures Assessed: How Technology Assessment, Ethics and Think Tanks Make Sense of an Unknown Future | 195 |
| 1 The Assessment Regime: Damned to Explore the Future | 195 |
| 2 The Discursivity of Futures | 196 |
| 3 The Assessment Regime: Making the Future Decidable | 198 |
| 4 Articulations and Representations of the Future | 199 |
| 5 From Future to Futures: The Case of the Royal Society | 200 |
| 5.1 Institutions and Reports: Mutual Dependencies | 200 |
| 5.2 A Report's Recommendations: The Delegation of Futures | 202 |
| 5.3 The Delegated Futures of Technology Assessment | 203 |
| 6 From Future to Futures: The Case of Nano-Ethics | 204 |
| 6.1 The Academic Discourse of Ethics | 205 |
| 6.2 Nano-Ethics: Preparing Preparedness for Futures in the Present | 206 |
| 7 From Futures to Present: The Case of a Think Tank | 208 |
| 7.1 From Future to Expectations | 209 |
| 7.2 The Democratization of Futures | 210 |
| 8 Conclusions | 211 |
| References | 212 |
| Part IV Assessing Dialogue: Governing Nano by ELSI | 214 |