: Josef Drexl, Reto M. Hilty, Wolfgang Schön, Joseph Straus, Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt, Beatriz Conde Gal
: Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt, Beatriz Conde Gallego, Stefan Enchelmaier
: Abuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanisms?
: Springer-Verlag
: 9783540699651
: 1
: CHF 85.50
:
: Vergleichende und internationale Politikwissenschaft
: English
: 204
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF

As part of its review of competition law that started in the late 1990s, the European Commission proposes to revise its interpretation and application of the Treaty's prohibition of abuses of dominant positions. Also, it has instigated a debate about the promotion of private enforcement of EC competition law. On the former subject, the Commission published a Discussion Paper in 2005; on the latter, a Green Paper in 2005, followed by a White Paper in 2008.

The chapters in this volume critically appraise the Commission's proposals, including the most recent ones. The authors also highlight the repercussions of the proposed 'more economic approach' to abuses of dominant positions on private litigants' opportunities to bring damages actions in national courts for such abuses.

Abuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanisms?6
Table of Contents9
List of Contributors10
The Reform of Article 82 EC in the Light of the Economic Approach 11
1 Introduction11
2 The Discussion Paper in context13
3 The objective of Article 82 EC19
4 The as efficient competitor -test27
5 Conclusion29
Is there a Role for Market Definition and Dominance in an effects- based Approach?31
1 Introduction31
2 Criticism of the current assessment of unilateral exclusionary practices under Article 82 of the EC Treaty33
3 Towards the adoption of the new effects-based approach37
4 Getting rid of dominance? The long path from dominance to substantial market power39
5 Assessment of substantial market power in the new effects-based approach: How current assessment methodology may change46
6 Implications of the shift towards substantial market power50
7 Substantial market power, consumer welfare and significant competitive harm: Some flaws in the new effects- based approach57
8 Conclusions63
Abuse below the Threshold of Dominance? Market Power, Market Dominance, and Abuse of Economic Dependence65
1 Introduction65
2 Market power67
3 Economic dependence71
4 Dominant position under Article 82 EC81
5 Abusive practices94
6 Concluding remarks98
Efficiency Defence in Article 82 EC99
1 Introduction99
2 Defining abusive conduct100
3 The proposed efficiency defence104
4 Shift in competition policy105
5 Limits to the competition policy reform109
6 Application of Article 81 (3) EC112
7 The Reaction of the Community Courts114
8 Passing-on requirement115
9 Elimination of competition and efficiency defence119
10 Comparison with merger control123
11 Conclusion124
From Courage v Crehan to the White Paper The Changing Landscape of European Private Enforcement and the Possible Implications for Article 82 EC Litigation126
1 Introduction126
2 The public value of private action126
3 The (under) development of private enforcement in Europe129
4 Obstacles, challenges and proposed reforms134
5 The interplay between private enforcement and Article 82 EC140
6 Concluding remarks144
Private Enforcement Is Article 82 EC special?145
1 Introduction145
2 Private enforcement146
3 Article 82 EC and action for damages152
4 Should the leniency programme be extended to Article 82 EC?165
5 Costs as a disincentive to claim or can they become an incentive?166
6 Modernisation of Article 82 EC and the consequences for private enforcement167
7 Conclusion170
8 Post-script171
Private Incentive, Optimal Deterrence and Damage Claims for Abuses of Dominant Positions The Interaction between the Economic Review of the Prohibition of Abuses of Dominant Positions and Private Enforcement172
1 Introduction172
2 The concepts of individual harm and harm to competition175
3 The concept of legal standing176
4 Incentives and the optimal level of enforcement177
5 Potential private enforcers of Article 82 EC178
6 Conclusions194
The Role of Consumer Associations in the Enforcement of Article 82 EC197
1 Introduction197
2 Representative action shall not remove individual right of action200
3 Association s standing203
4 Distribution of compensation205
5 Conclusion209