: Frans H. Eemeren, Scott Jacobs, Erik C. W. Krabbe, John Woods, Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen.
: Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen
: Pondering on Problems of Argumentation Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues
: Springer-Verlag
: 9781402091650
: 1
: CHF 190.00
:
: Allgemeine und Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft
: English
: 306
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF

Pondering on Problems of Argumentation is a collection of twenty essays brought together for anyone who is interested in theoretical issues in the study of argumentation. This collection of papers gives the reader an insightful and balanced view of the kind of theoretical issues argumentation theorists are currently concerned with. Because most of the perspectives on argumentation that are en vogue are represented, this volume provides a multidisciplinary and even interdisciplinary outlook on the current state of affairs in argumentation theory. Some of the contributions in Pondering on Problems of Argumentation deal with problems of argumentation that have been recognized as theoretical issues for a considerable time, like the problems of fallaciousness and identifying argumentation structures. Other contributions discuss issues that have become a focus of attention only recently or regained their prominence, such as the relationship between dialectic and rhetoric, and the strategic use of the argumentative technique of dissociation. In five separate sections papers are included dealing with argumentative strategies, problems of norms of reasonableness and fallaciousness, types of argument and argument schemes the structure of argumentation and rules for advocacy and discussion.

Preface6
Contents7
Part I Argumentative Strategies21
Chapter 1 Seizing the Occasion: Parameters for Analysing Ways of Strategic Manoeuvring22
Chapter 2 Manoeuvring Strategically with Rhetorical Questions34
Chapter 3 Dissociation: Between Rhetorical Success and Dialectical Soundness43
Chapter 4 Strategies of Refutation by Definition: A Pragma-Rhetorical Approach to Refutations in a Public Speech53
Part II Norms of Reasonableness and Fallaciousness70
Chapter 5 Nonfallacious Rhetorical Design in Argumentation71
Chapter 6 Normatively Responsible Advocacy: Some Provocations from Persuasion Effects Research95
Chapter 7 Duets, Cartoons, and Tragedies: Struggles with the Fallacy of Composition107
Chapter 8 Deductivism and the Informal Fallacies121
Part III Types of Argument and Argument Schemes131
Chapter 9 From Figure to Argument: Contrarium in Roman Rhetoric132
Chapter 10 Comparing the Incomparable: Figurative Analogies in a Dialectical Testing Procedure148
Chapter 11 Argument Schemes Typologies in Practice: The Case of Comparative Arguments156
Chapter 12 Whether and How Classical Topics can be Revived Within Contemporary Argumentation Theory171
Part IV Structure of Argumentation193
Chapter 13 Against Making the Linked-Convergent Distinction194
Chapter 14 Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability203
Chapter 15 Modalities as Indicators in Argumentative Reconstruction218
Chapter 16 Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument240
Part V Rules for Advocacy and Discussion251
Chapter 17 On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage252
Chapter 18 Testing for Acceptable Premises Within Systems of Belief261
Chapter 19 The Duties of Advocacy: Argumentation Under Conditions of Disparity, Asymmetry, and Difference276
Chapter 20 Actually Existing Rules for Closing Arguments294
List of Contributors306
Index308