: Joseph Bernstein, Vladimir Hinich, Anna Melnikov
: Studies in Lie Theory Dedicated to A. Joseph on his Sixtieth Birthday
: Birkhäuser Basel
: 9780817644789
: 1
: CHF 150.40
:
: Arithmetik, Algebra
: English
: 494
: Wasserzeichen/DRM
: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet
: PDF

Contains new results on different aspects of Lie theory, including Lie superalgebras, quantum groups, crystal bases, representations of reductive groups in finite characteristic, and the geometric Langlands program

Irreducibility of perfect representations of double affine Hecke algebras (p. 79)

Ivan Cherednik.
Department of Mathematics
UNC Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
USA


Dedicated to A. Joseph on his 60th birthday

Summary. It is proved that the quotient of the polynomial representation of the double af.ne Hecke algebra by the radical of the duality pairing is always irreducible apart from the roots of unity provided that it is .nite dimensional. We also .nd necessary and suf.cient conditions for the radical to be zero, a generalization of Opdam’s formula for the singular parameters such that the corresponding Dunkl operators have multiple zero-eigenvalues.

Subject Classification: 20C08

In the paper we prove that the quotient of the polynomial representation of the double affine Hecke algebra (DAHA) by the radical of the duality pairing is always irreducible (apart from the roots of unity) provided that it is finite dimensional. We also find necessary and suf.cient conditions for the radical to be zero, which is a qgeneralization of Opdam’s formula for the singular k-parameters with the multiple zero-eigenvalue of the corresponding Dunkl operators.

Concerning the terminology, perfect modules in the paper are finite dimensional possessing a non-degenerate duality pairing. The latter induces the canonical duality anti-involution of DAHA. Actually, it suf.ces to assume that the pairing is perfect, i.e., identi.es the module with its dual as a vector space, but we will stick to the finitedimensional case.

We also assume that perfect modules are spherical, i.e., quotients of the polynomial representation of DAHA, and invariant under the projective action of PSL(2,Z). We do not impose the semisimplicity in contrast to [C3]. The irreducibility theorem in this paper is stronger and at the same time the proof is simpler than that in [C3].

Contents8
Preface10
Publications of Anthony Joseph14
Students of Anthony Joseph22
List of Summer Students22
From Denise Joseph24
From Jacques Dixmier: A Recollection of Tony Joseph25
Part I Survey and Review27
The work of Anthony Joseph in classical representation theory29
Quantized representation theory following Joseph35
1 Local Finiteness36
2 Geometry38
3 Trickle Down Economics41
References42
Part II Research Articles45
Opérateurs différentiels invariants et problème de Noether de Noether47
Introduction47
1. Une extension du problème de Noether pour les algèbres de Weyl49
2. Cas d une somme directe de repr ´ esentations de dimension 154
3. Cas d une repr ´ esentation de dimension 258
Bibliographie75
Langlands parameters for Heisenberg modules77
Introduction77
1. The space of T .-local systems78
2. The Heisenberg modules and the spectral decomposition81
References86
Instanton counting via affine Lie algebras II: From Whittaker vectors to the Seiberg Witten prepotential87
1. Introduction88
2. Schrödinger operators and the prepotential: the one-dimensional case91
3. Schrödinger operators in higher dimensions and integrable systems97
4. Proof of Nekrasov s conjecture101
References103
Irreducibility of perfect representations of double affine Hecke algebras105
1. Af.ne Weyl groups107
2. Double Hecke algebras109
3. Macdonald polynomials112
4. The radical115
5. The irreducibility116
6. A non-semisimple example118
References121
Algebraic groups over a 2-dimensional local field: Some further constructions123
Introduction123
1. The pro-vector space of distributions126
2. Existence of certain left adjoint functors131
3. The functor of coinvariants135
4. The functor of semi-invariants137
5. Proof of Proposition 4.2141
6. Distributions on a stack145
7. Induction via the moduli stack of bundles148
8. Proof of Theorem 7.9151
References156
Modules with a Demazure flag157
1. Introduction157